Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: ergophobe

Message Too Old, No Replies

Yahoo is probably going to be sued?

CAPTCHAS means innaccessibility for the blind?

1:47 pm on Sep 11, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member bwnbwn is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Oct 25, 2005
votes: 28

I know that target got sued for not being accessible. First, I thought, wow, that is going to effect a lot of people, but i think its going to affect more than I originally thought.

The original press release I found doesn’t mention sites that use text only CAPTCHAS. Very few sites take the time to add audio to their CAPTCHA boxes.

This is the article that got me thinking about this... Very interesting what will happen. <snip>

Question is, how long until yahoo and myspace get sued, and will this have an effect on information only sites?

[edited by: trillianjedi at 2:29 pm (utc) on Sep. 11, 2006]
[edit reason] Let's keep links to authority sites only please. [/edit]

10:01 am on Sept 14, 2006 (gmt 0)

New User

10+ Year Member

joined:July 3, 2006
votes: 0

For a long time I thought Captchas were in accesible however the audio feature on google seems to clear that up.

Will see more of this soon i feel hence not likely to be sued...

Just my opinion


11:01 pm on Sept 23, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member drdoc is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 15, 2002
votes: 0

Ever since I first started using CAPTCHAs (6 or so years ago) I used audio features from the very beginning. I don't think CAPTCHAs are inaccessible. In fact, I think very little content on the web needs to be inaccessible. For sure, only a very minute number of "content types" are inherently inaccessible. We are the ones making it inaccessible, not the type of content itself.