Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.147.26.192

Forum Moderators: ergophobe

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google launch search for the visually challenged

     
4:11 pm on Jul 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 14, 2003
posts:1550
votes: 0


Accessible Search is an early Google Labs product designed to identify and prioritize search results that are more easily usable by blind and visually impaired users. Regular Google search helps you find a set of documents that is most relevant to your tasks. Accessible Search goes one step further by helping you find the most accessible pages in that result set.

[labs.google.com...]

5:27 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member whoisgregg is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 9, 2003
posts:3416
votes: 0


Why is the top result sometimes red and sometimes not?

Example: "webmaster" [google.com] (blue) "webmaster world" [google.com] (red)

[edited by: whoisgregg at 5:39 pm (utc) on July 20, 2006]

5:34 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member whoisgregg is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 9, 2003
posts:3416
votes: 0


"yahoo" [google.com]

Does red mean "this is the result you probably want even if it's not the first, most accessible result?"

5:46 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member whoisgregg is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 9, 2003
posts:3416
votes: 0


Man, am I stupid.

<body bgcolor=#ffffff text=#000000 link=#0000ee
vlink=#ff0000 alink=#000099>

Bright freakin' red just gets me all worked up apparently. First feature request? Stick with the purple for visited links. :)

5:56 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 16, 2002
posts:2010
votes: 0


Ad-free too :)
Almost looks like Google pre-2002.

[edited by: amznVibe at 5:57 pm (utc) on July 20, 2006]

6:23 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 9, 2004
posts:1435
votes: 0


Google pre-2002?

Look at the copyright date when you do a search...

Copyright 2000 Google Inc
7:15 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from CA 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member encyclo is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 31, 2003
posts:9063
votes: 2


There is an interesting (but short) article from Reuters which contains an interview with the lead developer for the Accessible Search product, T.V. Raman (who is blind):

Google tests more accessible Web search for blind [today.reuters.com]

Accessible Search rates how, on balance, each Web page handles such issues and gives priority to pages that do the best job of balancing relevant data and solid design.

When comparing results with the standard Google results, it does appear that image-heavy sites and sites with, for example, video content are heavily downgraded in favor of simpler text-rich sites.

7:24 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 22, 2002
posts:1749
votes: 0


It's somewhat ironic that the SERPs don't comply with some of the most basic accessibility guidelines:
* no doctype
* markup used for styling purposes (<b>)
* tables for layout
8:11 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Full Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 23, 2005
posts:331
votes: 0


how are they profiting from this? Or is it the usual model of giving away bandwidth + cpu time and praying that somehow it'll make money.
8:35 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member jimbeetle is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 26, 2002
posts:3292
votes: 6


For the handful of searches I tried pages from one of my sites that usually rank in the first position still rank in the first position. I'd normally think this is great, but these pages are based on a design first cobbled together in 1997 and that has been, well, completely abused since then. The HTML behind them is a complete mess.

This tells me one of two things: Either Raman did a very bad job of modeling what's accessible or not, or the web is more messed up than I ever realized.

11:20 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from MY 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member vincevincevince is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 1, 2003
posts:4847
votes: 0


how are they profiting from this?

  • Deposits in the caring-company account
  • Avoiding future law-suits (remember Google is global and taking all reasonable measures to permit accessibility is a legal requirement in many countries, e.g. the UK)
    As a blind person planning to make a scapegoat to push online accessibility forward, who would you choose to sue? That's right, Google. With profits like they are recording it would be tough to argue that accessibility was outside of their resources.
  • Web-feeds-web: new visually-impaired users mean more market share, more recommendations from the (generally very loyal) visually-impaired community to all communities, press coverage leading to both new sighted and new visually-impaired users.
  • Stock price increase due to avoiding looking stagnant. Nothing front-end has affected Google's core search functionality for a long time. This is a true new core search functionality.
  • 11:31 pm on July 20, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Junior Member

    10+ Year Member

    joined:Dec 23, 2005
    posts:189
    votes: 0


    Services like these differentiate Google from rest of the stereotype companies.
    12:39 am on July 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Junior Member

    5+ Year Member

    joined:May 18, 2006
    posts:68
    votes: 0


    Bit of a half hearted effort from Google as usual.
    The page does not validate for XHTML 1.0 Transitional
    They must have someone kicking around the office who can code a decent page.

    They never seem to dedicate a lot of time to anything until it starts rolling in the money.

    Google have so many Beta products out there, when are they going to finish something?

    Not impressed.

    12:50 am on July 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Full Member

    10+ Year Member

    joined:Mar 31, 2004
    posts:299
    votes: 0


    Some interesting results for some of the searches I tried, quite accurate for one of the more spammy sectors I keep an eye on.

    System

    1:29 pm on July 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

    redhat

     
     


    The following 2 messages were cut out to new thread by encyclo. New thread at: accessibility_usability/3017224.htm [webmasterworld.com]
    10:06 am on July 21, 2006 (utc -4)
    2:07 pm on July 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

    New User

    10+ Year Member

    joined:Feb 8, 2006
    posts:14
    votes: 0


    A nice search, but riddle me this: some of the terms I watch return the top 3 results as having alt text spam, search spam or other nefarious spam techniques used. Will google heed a spam report from Accessible Search more than a spam report from regular SERPS? What is the point of having a site with 30 pictures and an average of 48 words per alt text read in a text browser? That is alt text repeating the same phrase a bunch of times in different variations.
    3:31 pm on July 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Senior Member from MY 

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member vincevincevince is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

    joined:Apr 1, 2003
    posts:4847
    votes: 0


    Interesting that a search for 'webmasterworld' does not bring back this site in the first position. The site which is leading has a number of 'accessible features' including accesskeys, title tags and alt tags. The CSS, however, is non-standard and there is no shortage of javascript functionality.

    Based on that small sample I think that sites are being downgraded if they don't have ALT tags, TITLE tags, or ACCESS KEYS. Fonts on both this site and the other are scalable.

    4:21 pm on July 21, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Senior Member

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

    joined:Mar 14, 2003
    posts:1550
    votes: 0


    form google Accessible Search FAQ

    How do you decide which sites are "accessible" and which are not?

    [...]Currently we take into account several factors, including a given page's simplicity, how much visual imagery it carries and whether or not it's primary purpose is immediately viable with keyboard navigation.

    what I can make out of this:

  • page simplicity: flash, videos, sound, dhtml ARE NOT simple so they are 'downgraded' - they may even extend this to table based vs table less designs
  • visual imagery: image heavy sites, maybe even image based navigation, obvious non-use of alt tags are 'penalised'
  • keyboard navigation = accesskeys

    Anything else I missed?

  • 9:33 am on July 23, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Junior Member

    10+ Year Member

    joined:Dec 13, 2004
    posts:121
    votes: 0


    Just noting that there are national versions too

    [google.co.uk...]
    [google.de...]
    [google.fr...]

    For example.

    5:54 pm on July 23, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Senior Member from CA 

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member encyclo is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

    joined:Aug 31, 2003
    posts:9063
    votes: 2


    Another more detailed article about the service with interview quotes from T.V. Raman:

    [out-law.com...]

    Raman said: "We don't test against WCAG. We think in the spirit of those guidelines, but we don't test against them verbatim." Instead he endeavoured to identify "what works for the end-user," describing a process of "experimentation, training and machine learning. (...) We look for a set of signals, do some numbers, see what comes out..."
    12:48 am on July 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

    New User

    5+ Year Member

    joined:Mar 24, 2006
    posts:13
    votes: 0


    If google want to provide a search service for Visually Impaired users why haven't they changed the white background color. Only a small percentage of V.I. people are totally blind - the glare of the white background makes it very difficult for partially sighted users to read the content. Also difficult for people with Irlen Syndrome/color sensitivities.

    Just noticed also that the search doesnt have the spellcheck function of the normal google.

    9:01 am on July 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Senior Member

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

    joined:Dec 5, 2002
    posts:1318
    votes: 0


    Just wondering why Google don't do this for their normal search. Then people would be forced to make accessible sites.
    9:21 am on July 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Senior Member

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

    joined:Sept 22, 2002
    posts:1749
    votes: 0


    @Hester: whatever Google's mission may be (organize the world's information? make money for shareholders?), making the web more accessible is not.
    8:38 am on July 25, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Senior Member

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

    joined:Dec 5, 2002
    posts:1318
    votes: 0


    That's a pity. They could have a lot of influence in this area, which would benefit everyone.
    8:56 am on July 26, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Senior Member

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

    joined:Mar 14, 2003
    posts:1550
    votes: 0


    That's a pity. They could have a lot of influence in this area, which would benefit everyone.

    +1

    As (one of) the company that has the most impact in todays' internet, I thinks it should become they 'social responsability' to help improve the 'web accessibility' as well as continuing to improve their algo.

    I don't mean that this should become their priority (no change in business model etc) BUT with the tools at their disposal, they should actively 'promote' web accessibiliy.

    3:11 pm on July 28, 2006 (gmt 0)

    Senior Member

    WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

    joined:Apr 25, 2005
    posts:677
    votes: 0


    Looks like old Google page
    Good that they care about those people
     

    Join The Conversation

    Moderators and Top Contributors

    Hot Threads This Week

    Featured Threads

    Free SEO Tools

    Hire Expert Members