Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.205.140.252

Forum Moderators: buckworks & not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

LinkedIn Takes Legal Action To Stop Site Scrapers Stealing Profiles

     
5:14 pm on Jan 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:23512
votes: 412


Professional network LinkedIn is fighting off shady competitors that are using bots to vacuum up hundreds of thousands of its user profiles in order to compete with LinkedIn’s own recruiter products, according to a new lawsuit.

In a complaint filed this week in San Francisco, LinkedIn asked a court to grant orders that will allow it to stop a group of “John Does” from scraping its servers, and to make the unknown defendants pay for allegedly breaching federal and state hacking statutes as well as a variety of other laws.

LinkedIn explained that since May of 2013, unknown people have been deploying a wave of bots that create thousands of fake profiles in order to interact with real LinkedIn users and siphon their user profiles. LinkedIn Takes Legal Action To Stop Site Scrapers Stealing Profiles [gigaom.com]


In order to identify the creator of the bots, LinkedIn said it will issue discovery orders to Amazon Web Services, which the defendants are using to create and store information related to the fake profiles.
12:50 am on Jan 9, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 13, 2003
posts:701
votes: 0


WebmasterWorld perpetual thread spotting AWS/NSA IP ranges to kettle:

[webmasterworld.com...]
7:38 am on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from LK 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 16, 2005
posts:2589
votes: 60


Its not clear that they have a copyright case - the copyright for information in the profiles is held by the person who wrote the profile. Nothing in the user agreement says otherwise.

They probably have a case for breach of the user agreement, where scrapers have signed up for fake profiles. AFAIK that is a criminal offence in the US (so is signing up for Facebook with a false name, in theory), but in other jurisdictions they may have to sue each person separately for actual damages. Difficult.
9:02 am on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:23512
votes: 412


If they can prove it's an organised attack, they may have a case against the company involved.
2:21 pm on Jan 13, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 27, 2001
posts: 2548
votes: 0


Classic. They could probably hire one employee with the right knowledge for six figures per year to combat the bots. But ... they'd rather spend millions on a lawsuit.
4:31 am on Jan 14, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from LK 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Nov 16, 2005
posts:2589
votes: 60


Unlike most of us they can afford to do both.

The advantage of the lawsuit is that if they get damages it makes an example of the scraper to deter others.