Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 50.19.190.144

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Flickr now offering 1TB free space for your photos

     
2:08 am on May 21, 2013 (gmt 0)

Administrator from JP 

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:Oct 12, 2000
posts:14487
votes: 49


http://blog.flickr.net/en/2013/05/20/a-better-brighter-flickr/ [blog.flickr.net]

A better, brighter Flickr

Biggr. A free terabyte of space

At Flickr, we believe you should share all your images in full resolution, so life's moments can be relived in their original quality. No limited pixels, no cramped formats, no memories that fall flat. We're giving your photos room to breathe, and you the space to upload a dizzying number of photos and videos, for free. Just how big is a terabyte? Well, you could take a photo every hour for forty years without filling one.

And yep, you heard us. It's free.


Now we're talking. ;)
At 1TB most can finally have enough space to archive their collections online. If all your photos are on Yahoo then you might be tempted to use their other services.
2:18 am on May 21, 2013 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Jan 6, 2011
posts:466
votes: 0


lol, so much they should have done so long ago. I wonder if they'll be able to pull all this "new" Yahoo stuff off.
2:40 am on May 21, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 14, 2004
posts:864
votes: 0


This is too little too late. I'm a fan of Flickr, but they could have been instagram 3 years ago if they wanted. They didn't seem to have a vision.

Yahoo needs to do exactly what Google learned years ago: they have to start re-branding and re-working the products they acquire to work with their other products.
3:13 pm on May 21, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

joined:Jan 1, 2011
posts:1358
votes: 18


Let's see, they were a photo storage site. Now they're a MORE photo storage site. Wow, the innovation boggles the mind.
8:04 pm on May 21, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from US 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 9, 2011
posts:12720
votes: 244


Inquiring minds want to know: What's in it for them?
4:01 am on May 22, 2013 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator incredibill is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Jan 25, 2005
posts:14624
votes: 88


More importantly, when they decide to end Flickr, everything comes to an end. How the heck to they plan on giving customers those 1TB stores? 10+ DVDs? Assuming anyone has a DVD reader anymore as personal physical storage has gone the way of the DoDo Bird in favor of cloud storage. Soon nobody will have a copy of anything and then a FaceBook or Flickr goes offline the loss is going to be incredible.
9:54 am on May 22, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from ZA 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:July 15, 2002
posts:1720
votes: 1


Maybe I'm the only one - but I'm still in favour of personal storage, I use the cloud but very selectively.
12:17 pm on May 22, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

joined:Mar 4, 2010
posts:1302
votes: 0


Storage for YOUR photos or scraper storage of OUR photos?
2:47 pm on May 22, 2013 (gmt 0)

Moderator

WebmasterWorld Administrator skibum is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Sept 20, 2000
posts:4469
votes: 1


If people can view full high res photos then presumably they can download them too so does that mean anyone who uploads their hi res photos to Flikr is essentially giving them away?

If you are shooting raw files a TB can go pretty fast.
4:13 pm on May 22, 2013 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:July 23, 2004
posts:473
votes: 35


I stay out of the *clouds and keep my feet on the ground .. Storing "my stuff" on someone elses server just doesn't sit real well with me.

Trust issues I think .. Or .. I own my own stuff .. take your pick.

Yahoo isn't the only company out there that's done stupid things .. I can recall multitudes of stupid things that Google has done over the years and they aren't even as old as Yahoo is ..

All in all, I still view Yahoo as something that might mean something .. I mean, C'Mon .. The fact that Yahoo is still out there wandering around the pasture like Google and Microsoft can say quite a bit when you consider it's history.
4:28 pm on May 31, 2013 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 13, 2002
posts:408
votes: 0


Combine Google Glass with Flickr and you could save everything you do throughout your life.
7:18 pm on June 5, 2013 (gmt 0)

Senior Member from ZA 

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:July 15, 2002
posts:1720
votes: 1


Would people upload raw file format images to Flickr - I expect they would upload a JPEG, I know I do. It can still be a hefty 10mb image.
12:49 pm on June 6, 2013 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Aug 13, 2002
posts:408
votes: 0


I doubt anyone would upload raw file format images unless they were making the images available for others to work upon or they were storing a back up for their own convenience.