Forum Moderators: open
Any info regarding this bizarre instance, I'd sure like to know what that was about.
Dear Marketing Genius: Next time you want to disturb and perturb me into unfocusing on my table's discussion and the food in my face please do so by dressing up little school girls - if you're hell bent on such people as you "reps" - in dresses.
This edgy little production had just 1 iota enough of "something not perfectly squeaky clean" to pretty much piss me off.
Ya, ya. It wan't exploitive of anything. I mean, you'd have to be a dirty old man to see it that way, right? I mean, it was an aquatic display, plain and simple. That's why they had to come equipped in their little outfits.
Call me wrong or crazy but this wan't nothing but cute. Cute is print dresses and bows in the hair. This was "something extra well clothed in plausible deniability". Marketing genius, right?
Try to convince me of that about my daughter of similar age - that the job requires her to prance around a roomful of mature men in her bathing suit - and I'll give you an aquatic show, head first in the nearest toilet.
(Second rant in as many days. Time for a holiday.)
Try to convince me of that about my daughter of similar age - that the job requires her to prance around a roomful of mature men in her bathing suit - and I'll give you an aquatic show, head first in the nearest toilet.
Or even worse - down Bourbon Street. That really suprised me when I saw then prancing down the middle of the street on Thursday night...
In New Orleans, our choreographer recruited local dancers. As for some of the dancers being under 18--they were professional dancers, part of a dance troupe, not "booth babes."
You can see more about the swimmers here:
[flickr.com ]
[promo.fortunefun.com ]
The cards we gave out led here: [promo.fortunefun.com ]