How many posts do you have to place before you change from being a new user?
WebJoe
4:24 am on Jan 20, 2004 (gmt 0)
I believe it was 50 for me, but as I heard (better: read) somewhere in this forum the numbers for becoming a new status change every now and then.
sparticus
1:30 am on Feb 13, 2004 (gmt 0)
I was going to ask the same question - if philr has been a member for two years and has made more than 30 posts I wouldn't call him a 'new' user... But it's obviously not my call...
limbo
2:47 pm on Feb 14, 2004 (gmt 0)
Doesn't take into account the length of time you have been a member. Which is the best way of looking at it, in my opinion. The more you contribute, the more value you add, hence the more senior position.
Off the top of my head: (but like it was mentioned above, these change)
I had the opinion a junior member was someone under 18 years of age.
TheDoctor
3:54 pm on Feb 15, 2004 (gmt 0)
philr, that's why I liked being called a junior member. I was in my 50s and was called "junior".
Now I'm a full member. Anyone who's seen my waist may think that's a more apt description. :-)
philr
11:57 pm on Feb 15, 2004 (gmt 0)
Yes I am the same I haven't been called a junior for years.
lawman
12:01 am on Feb 16, 2004 (gmt 0)
According to my birth certificate, I'm 53. However, my wife seems to take great pleasure in telling me how immature I am (which I wear like a badge of honor).
Can I still be in the "old geezer's brigade"?
lawman
dnimrodx
12:33 am on Feb 16, 2004 (gmt 0)
my wife seems to take great pleasure in telling me how immature I am (which I wear like a badge of honor).
lol. So does my wife! I know the feeling very well and I am also proud for sometimes being a child in a man's body.