Forum Moderators: LifeinAsia
I never take non-competing clauses of any kind, and never talk about my clients, to clients.
<added> I curently have 3 clients on first page of Google for a given query, and I can live with that. ;) </added>
It's one thing to be a gun for hire to the highest bidder, and another to be a businessperson with a sense of eithics, one who can be trusted with confidential information.
It's tricky balancing the need$ of Numero Uno, and minding your client's business.
davemarks,
When I do a traffic report to clients, it always ends by recommendations in order to reach for the top. The decision to follow or not to follow recommendations is theirs, not mine.
>>It's one thing to be a gun for hire to the highest bidder, and another to be a businessperson with a sense of eithics, one who can be trusted with confidential information.
martinibuster,
I dont see me as a gun for hire to the highest bidder, and I believe I do have a sense of ethics. Lets not confuse a non competing clause and a non disclosure clause. They are totally different.
See message # 2
and never talk about my clients, to clients.
Most of my clients are web agencies. They all compete on the same ground and all have clients competing on the same grounds. Once again, I just tell them wich amount of effort is necessary to achieve results. If they decide to make the effort or not is their decision.
I never said you were a gun for hire. If you review my post you will see that I not only didn't mention you, I didn't even address anything you stated.
That's no accident: I was addressing the question of the original post, and nothing and nobody else.
The analogy of a "gun for hire" is just that, an analogy that serves as a counterpoint to the ethical businessman, which I have absolutely no doubt that you are.
But I apologize if anyone misinterpreted my statement because Macguru is one of the shining lights at webmasterworld, let there be no mistake about it.
:) Y
[edited by: martinibuster at 3:09 am (utc) on May 16, 2003]