Forum Moderators: LifeinAsia

Message Too Old, No Replies

Is there money in a banner driven nightclub photography website?

         

bocaj

9:10 pm on Nov 4, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have seen a few websites that go around to various nightclubs snap pictures of the patrons and then post them the next day for people to view or download and use them on their myspace or other social networking website. This to seems like a pretty good draw because everyone wants to see pics of themselves especially them all dolled up looking their best.

I built a website for a buddy of mine who DJs in local club/bars around a university. I told him this is a myspace generation and if you want traffic then if you have someone come out and snap pictures of all the girls and some random guys. So I took the tough job of being the "photographer" who snaps the hot drunk college girls who pose and make out with each other. His stats in Jan 2006 were Uniques=1636, Number of visits=6599, Pages=243099. Then it started to climb and in Jul 2006 Uniques=4412, Number of visits=15044, Pages=346197. Now to me this doesn't seem that big of a deal in the WWW world.. but from a local perspective where this is a bunch college students who visit this website every min just waiting for the updated pictures of themselves and their friends, and of course older guys who want to see young college drunk party girls ( no nudity though ). I'm just wondering if these numbers are enough to bring in advertising on that websit. Now I can't serve google ADs due tot he fact there is no text on the pages it is all images and of course the google ads don't target properly if there is no text.

OK so second part of the question.. since this seems to have grown fairly popular but I am tied to just the particular DJ i was going to break off on my own to the downtown area where there are alot more clubs and people AND people with money, not just broke college kids. I was thinking of snapping the pics for free and just passing out biz cards with the URL to drive local traffic to download the pics of them in the clubs/bars. Is advertising really about millions of visitors a day or can you still make decent coin if its a local targeted audience trying to sell web ads to local bars and clubs clothing stores etc.

And are their any other angles to make money that i am not thinking of here?

jtara

1:23 am on Nov 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I know of a similar operation in my city that has been going now for a few years. I think the photography is a loss-leader. They don't even host their own pictures - they use Shutterfly.

It appears to me that they make their money selling event tickets and selling marketing services to venues. They seem pretty vertically-integrated, and are a part of a marketing/PR firm that works for the various venues to promote events. They do cross-promotion with local entertainment magazines - I presume they get a free page in the magazine in exchange for giving the magazine free ads. They now have a local print publication of their own which consists of pictures shot at events and ads - yet they still have their own page in other magazines.

I really doubt you can make money just working the photography aspect of it. That's where these guys started, but I don't think that part went anywhere money-wise.

I could be wrong - Shutterfly does pay "Pro Gallery" owners when people order prints. But somehow I doubt that the pictures are the big money maker. What I really think is going on is that they had to get in good with the clubs to be able to take the pictures, and in the process learned the business and gained the trust of the clubs. The photographers are there all the time, schmoozing with customers, and probably know more about the customers now than the club owners do. Over time, they went from being a (probably money-losing) internet-pictures outfit to a marketing/PR firm.

Local businesses are still very print-oriented, BTW. If you don't have a print publication (even if it one that people throw away or line their birdcases with) they aren't interested. For most, web exposure is just a nice extra.

bocaj

8:36 am on Nov 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I went out this evening and spoke with a few GM's of clubs and they seemed interested, a couple asked me what it was going to cost them i said oh its free, they kinda lit up. I think the draw here would be to get enough traffic stats and then go back to the clubs and offer ad space and promotion of their special events or nights at their clubs. Since I would have the attention of alot of club goers I can promote a certain event or night and get paid fo said promotion. Also local business I feel would want to advertise as well with the traffic. But you do make a good point about people still being very print oriented.. Lets just hope that if things swing the way of the web and this might be some what lucrative.. Who knows.. its worth a shot.. and boy do the girls love it when you bring a BIG camera around they fell all important ;) so who said money was the only form of payment.. JUST KIDDING.. of course i always stay professional, what do they say? dont get your honey where you get your money? hmm but of course if im not making money... jk ;) Thanks for the reply it def gave me food for though keep them coming :)

P.S. is the site your thinking napkinnights? i think they are in CA but they are kind of like the model im going after their website is perfectly layed out.. I need to get better at php scripting though.. grrr

DXL

12:34 am on Nov 17, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I've developed several sites for several sites that do what you're talking about. Most of their traffic comes from people who want to see their own pictures (or pictures of hot college students), the rest comes from people who want to find out about upcoming events in their city. These are niche sites, however, geared towards a particular ethnic group and parties that cater to this group.

The site owner does pretty good in terms of Adsense revenue, but his real bread and butter comes from what he charges promoters to list their event flyers on his site. That, and he charges some venues or event promoters to take pictures of their party (because its obviously good branding for that particular venue or promoter, and lets people see that their events have a lot of good looking people in attendance).

It took a year, year and a half for things to really take off, though, and it depends on who (if anyone) you're competing with. He didn't profit the whole first year, then things took off.

DWarp9

10:35 pm on Dec 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



In Copenhagen (the capital of Denmark) where I come from, we have several large sites in this category.

What they do is pretty similar to your concept, taking pictures of party-goers and listing events at clubs and so on, all of which they do for free.
The sites require you to sign up to view the pictures, but this is still free, which increase the number of users.
However, they have a set of features, like access other users "private" photos, see who has marked your photos as favourites and so on, for which they charge a monthly fee of ~$10.
It sounds like a lot, but a lot of people are actually willing to pay this! Of course, the site takes on a lot of the functions of a dating site, but it caters to much more mainstream users, who don't see it that way, and just enjoy the self-promoting.

Regards, Peter

LifeinAsia

10:43 pm on Dec 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



One aspect of this that no one has mentioned is the liability issue. Technically, you will be posting all these pictures of people taken without their written permission. For maybe 99.9% of the time, it's not an issue- as has been mentioned, people like to see pictures of themselves.

But all it takes is the one time you have a pic of a guy partying with his girlfriend and his wife's friends see it and tell her, prompting her to file for divorce. Then the guy's divorce lawyer suggests that he try to recoup his losses by suing you for posting his picture without his permission, which caused him significant mental stress and financial loss.

Obviously, getting signed waivers from everyone isn't going to work. But you may be able to limit your liability (consult with a lawyer to see how much) by havig the nightclub owner post a sign at the entrance saying that anyone entering the club gives their permission to be protographed and have the pictures posted on your site. (Universal Studios has a similar notice granting them permission to use pictures of anyoen in the park for marketing and promotional purposes. I don't know if anyoen has ever challenged them on the legality of it, but I imagine they have pretty high priced lawyers that did some major research on the issue.)

[edited by: LifeinAsia at 10:57 pm (utc) on Dec. 5, 2006]

bocaj

10:55 pm on Dec 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hmm but why would he sue me for? the picture was taken out in public. It would be the same thing as a Private investigator snappina pic of a husband cheating on his wife and then the husband trying to come back and sue the PI for snappin that pic. it cant be done because he is in public or in the publics eye. Think of all the paparazzi they would all be out of business if this was the case.

LifeinAsia

11:04 pm on Dec 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



The difference between you and a PI is that you are posting the pictures publicly. And the difference between you and the paparazzi is that the courts have pretty much deemed public figures to not have any privacy to violate. Non-famous Joe Blow would probably have the privacy issue on his side.

I'm just saying that the issue could come up and would suggest you talk to a lawyer ahead of time.

bocaj

11:18 pm on Dec 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



oh i totally understand where you are coming from.. and there would be a disclaimer that if any image needs to be removed immedately then all you have to do is ask to have it taken down. I think they would have to prove malicious intent of the photograph or if he wasnt obviously posing and it was a sneaky shot, I have spoken with a few lawyers and they all say as long as the person can email and have the picture taken down you are in public domain. But its good you bring this point up because i think it might be a grey area.....i will ask around, and good point on posting a sign out front of the club saying that their picture might be taken and posted on a website :) thanks for the heads up