Forum Moderators: LifeinAsia
Dilemma; to demonstrate that I know what I am talking about, I need to aks important questions and give out some important information.
On several occasions, I had the impression that they just wanted to pick my brain.
Anybody having experience CHARGING MONEY for the first interview?
Thanks in advance
If you're trained and have the work load, people come to you for more than business "fishing trips," you can pick and choose. I would say if your career/status is at that point, the initial consultation is billable.
In the past this is a BIG problem for me, but I'm changing it. Too many customers have come and gone, leaving knowing they'll get more out of the dollars they spend with me than months with someone else, but many of them just don't get it. All that time invested in the "pitch" is one big waste of time.
If I go talk to my lawyer, it's $35 for a half hour, and he/she hits the clock as soon as I sit down. That doesn't change if we start talking about his wife's gardening, or whether or not he/she can be of any help to my situation.
What's required is to look at it as an initial consultation. Not a sales pitch begging for work. I think your time is billable. If a customer can't respect that, let them go "down the street."
Note: this does not work with many Mom 'n Pops and the totally clueless, many of them will think they are getting their whole sites optimized.
The idea is that an easy score keeps the less than pro thieves away from the good merchandise.
In the web world, the pros won't need to pick your brain, and the amatures will be thrilled to pick up a few less than productive hints because they won't know the difference anyhow.
As the old saying goes "Always leave them smiling".
Note: I recommend all work be by signed contract - even if it is as simple as maximum n-hours at n-dollars per hour to provide x-result. Verbal amorphous directions lead to he-said she-said I thought you meant misunderstandings and lost clients or revenue.
Anybody having experience CHARGING MONEY for the first interview?
I do now.
Prior to meeting I require the following from a client:
* synopsis of the company, its history, its products and markets.
* cv of company principals and employees with project authority.
* either a project RFP/RFQ or a description of project goals.
Prior to meeting I provide the following to a client:
* my cv.
* a short list of client references.
* a notorised statement of my business insurance cover.
* Note: if responding to a formal competitive RFP/RFQ I forgo the following: an initial meeting contract specifing where, when, how long, about what, for how much. One page very simple. No meeting without signature and cheque.
The requirement for information transfer forces the client to respond professionally; the contract requiring signature and cheque up front forces the client to take me seriously. It weeds out the "brain-pickers" nicely.
And yes I still get shocked responses but business is good enough to ignore them. Naturally I was somewhat more flexible when starting out.
See following "know your client threads" - yes, I am blowing my own horn but I believe the point is important:
Do a background check [webmasterworld.com]
Learning about the client got me the job [webmasterworld.com]
In the end it comes down to how you see yourself which determines how you act which determines how a client responds.
The question is, how can you leverage this into a win-win situation? One way is to offer these types of people to "pick your brain over lunch." They buy you lunch and get an hour's worth of your wisdom and knowledge. Anything beyond that is a paid consulting gig.
You can use this in a couple of ways: it builds a relationship and you can ask the person for referral business at the end of the meeting.