Forum Moderators: phranque
[reuters.co.uk...]
I believe that most of the spyware/parasiteware is downloaded without the users knowledge. If they do want the program, then they'll keep it, but if they were tricked or mislead into downloading it, they could easily uninstall it.
Many of the existing programs out there are very difficult to uninstall.
Defining which programs would be required to add the big red uninstall button could be based on complaints by consumers.
If these products really are desired by consumers, then the makers have nothing to worry about.
before using those, please know your registry.
When my wife and I wanted to put in a pool, we were told that it's a law to put a child-safety gate around it. At the time we didn't even have children - but some neighbor's kid could come onto our property (after hopping an 8 foot fence mind you) and drown. Hello? Shouldn't you watch your kid instead of making ME install a gate?
Look at how rampant lawsuits are over the most STUPID things ... burglars trip and hurt themselves while trying to rob you and sue you because they were injured while on your property. Spill hot coffee on your self and sue the fast food chain that served it to you. It's rediculous. What ever happened to people taking responsibility for their own actions? If you trip and fall, it's YOUR fault - watch where you're going next time. If you install spyware on your computer, it's YOUR fault - try actually READING the terms of use that you AGREE TO whenever you install software.
I like the fact that for the most part the Internet isn't controlled by the government with laws & legislation. It's really the last thing we have that isn't, and I want to keep it that way.
So no, I'm not for making spyware illegal because that's just the first step in saying that anything can be banned just because some people are too stupid to READ the terms of use. I don't run anti-virus software, and I've never had a virus, spyware, or any of that crap on my system - ever. I'm smart enough not to get one.
No, I don't develop or endorse spyware or anything like that ... I'm just saying that if we allow the government to make it "illegal" then it's going to open the door for anything ELSE they decide to make illegal. Next they'll say that web stats are intrusive and make those illegal. Then they'll want to wipe out all adult websites (for the record, I do not frequent adult websites but I sure as heck support everyone else's RIGHT to do so if they choose). It's just another form of control that will be disguised as a public service, protecting children, whatever. If we let government legislate ANY OF IT, it's going to give them the OK to expand their definition of what's harmful.
Pay attention to what you're doing, what you're installing, etc. and you won't have to worry about spyware or viruses.
In contrast, when I download the Google toolbar, I have to CHOOSE between enabling or disabling the ability to send information to Google...you are forced to choose one or the other, or you don't get the toolbar. But usually I get junk on my computer without ever being asked to read any fine print, and you know for sure the kids aren't going to read fine print. Do we all have to become savvy computer experts in order to avoid the clever schemes of spyware programmers? Will we have to instruct our kids to not download ANYTHING, because the internet is an inherently dangerous place?
Every parent who has Windows installed on their computer is completely capable of preventing their children from downloading and installing unwanted software. All you have to do is setup a limited account.
The limited account is intended for someone who should be prohibited from changing most computer settings and deleting important files. A user with a limited account:Cannot install software or hardware, but can access programs that have already been installed on the computer.
Can change his or her account picture and can also create, change, or delete his or her password.
Cannot change his or her account name or account type. A user with a computer administrator account must make these kinds of changes.
If someone can just mandate a one click uninstall for the offending downloaded programs, that would probably take care of most of the problems.
Unfortunately, I think this would be as about effective as outlawing Spam or a do not Spam list.
As an interesting exercise check out Alexa top one hundred and see how many of these spyware places are in there. Bloody epidemic.
As an interesting exercise check out Alexa top one hundred and see how many of these spyware places are in there. Bloody epidemic.
This is an interesting thread, but I think that passing laws will just drive a lot of it underground. Some of it may go away, just like some spam email is gone. That only happens when the offenders decide to play by the rules.
I hate spyware (especially having to go and remove it cause it's slowing down my computer) and I want to see whoever made each and every one of them slowly either beaten to death by midgets or in prison for atleast 2 years.
DO NOT NETWORK IT
And use it only for surfing the web and get your emails
If kids do not have a machine of their own..too bad.. But don't use my pro tool.
Again does a young kid need a top-notch machine?
Buy a used one and load RH! :)
I also think that a one-click uninstall would hurt the typical dummy that you're trying to protect because they could "accidentally" uninstall software they WANT to use.
It still falls back on personal responsibility - there are security settings and all kinds of things you can do to prevent auto execution, etc. Again, I've never had any problems with any of it because I don't allow ActiveX crap to run in a web page without prompting or download stuff that's not from a recognized location or vendor.
So after giving this some thought, I came up with a relatively simple solution that maybe some of us can get together on if you like the idea. Why not have a website with a database of executable files and a description of what they do. I could write a fairly simple client utility that anyone could download to their system. It would run in the background and search local files once a day, on demand, or whenever and look for new executable files that are on the system that weren't there on the previous scan. It would then take those filenames, byte sizes, version, etc. and send it over to this web-database for verification. The Web DB can determine whether the file is considered "safe" from a recognized vendor, spyware, whatever, and if anything negative pops up it could pop up an alert the user and give them the option to delete the file (and related files) right then.
The software/hardware end of it is simple, I could have a system like this written in a day. The only time consuming part would be keeping the information up to date, watching for spyware, etc. I would want to keep it anonymous (ie; no "registration" process, and not log what users have what files on their system) but when a file comes in that's not recognized by the database it could be flagged so the DB administrators could search for information about the file and determine whether its safe or not.
I dunno, that's just off the top of my head. What do you guys think?
Would it be possible to write a program that, in addition to what you suggest, would also look at a file before it's ever downloaded, and alert the user if it is in the "Spyware database"? That way it never even gets to their system at all.