Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Is Open RAN the Future for Rural Net Access?

         

not2easy

2:48 pm on Jan 10, 2021 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



There are many high end, high speed internet options for people and businesses in major urban areas of the world but not much success in getting the same kind of service out to rural customers. The cost means not enough ROI to interest the major telecom and cable companies apparently.

Getting access to a useful internet connection has been a real problem for many consumers around the world. So-called developed countries are not any better than backwater services for people who are not near the big service providers.

For years, expensive and limited satellite services have been the only real option. StarLink is in the works but costs close to the same as existing satellite service where it is available (though without the bandwidth limits) and adds a grid of hardware overhead. Cell towers have extended the wireless reach but there are millions of would-be clients outside the reliable reach of even cell phone service.

I've been running into interesting articles about Open RAN (Open Radio Access Networks) as the low cost solution to offer better internet access for rural communities around the world.

Vodafone is currently working on an Open RAN test area in Wales, a country that is part of the UK in the southwest area of England. They also have trials in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Mozambique, building on experience in South Africa and Turkey.

Nokia is working on Open RAN projects as well
The RAN is the final link between the network and the phone. It is the visible piece and includes the antennae we see on towers, on top of buildings or in stadia, plus the base stations. When we make a call or connect to a remote server e.g. to watch a YouTube video, the antenna transmits and receives signals to and from our phones or other hand-held devices. The signal is then digitalized in the RAN base station and connected into the network.
and explains how it works here: [nokia.com...]

Sandro Tavares, the Global Head of Mobile Networks Marketing for Nokia explains the importance [nokia.com]of the fit-together off-the-shelf technology in making it affordable:
It was decided by the initial groups that were working with this, either the TIP project or the Open RAN alliance, that it would be beneficial for the industry that these interfaces between the different building blocks of the radio network would be standardized,” Tavares said. “So, you could have operators or projects utilizing 5G solutions from different vendors into the same radio network, and it would also reduce the barrier for entry for new vendors in this domain.

For those looking for remote access options, would you consider using Open RAN and is it available where you are? I am also curious about its popularity, cost and function. Is this a good answer?

lammert

4:38 pm on Jan 10, 2021 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



A typical First World problem.

When I lived in Kazakhstan mobile internet was available deep in the desert. Not 5G, but decent enough to stay connected. Our guesthouse in the mountains has a broadband connection beamed from a central tower 15 km away for 15 USD per month. At that time I was shocked when I visited a member of this forum in Yosemite Park in the US which didn't have a normal Internet infrastructure at that time, despite the millions of visitors each year.

The problem is not the technology but the will of providers to lose money on some parts of the infrastructure to make their service coverage better overall. RAN won't solve that underlying problem of thinking "profit" before "service".

martinibuster

7:56 pm on Jan 10, 2021 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I have municipal fiberoptic Internet, our small town created it, because the big ISPs declined to service our areas and I'm loving unlimited bandwidth and capacity.

The capacity is out there. The cable companies are lying. I think American companies are squeezing Americans to settle for crappy just barely enough bandwidth and are even imposing limits to how much they can consume per month.

So if it's a scheme that delivers less than Fiber it's probably a ripoff, imo. I wouldn't settle for less than fiberoptic Internet.

not2easy

2:49 am on Jan 12, 2021 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



That sounds like a great service @martinibuster. I got my hopes up last summer when I read that a local ISP offered fiber optic service where I live. I signed on, and it may be fiberoptic but it is nothing at all close to what you describe. Streaming, even at low 720p res is iffy and often lags to a stop for brief breaks. My wireless is better but at leafy times of the year is just not that great. Terrain takes a toll as well.

I was hoping to hear about any one who might have used the Open RAN type of service. A local ISP was overheard talking with a business group and mentioned they are looking into 'something new' but I am not certain that is what they were discussing. I am tired of getting my hopes up.

tangor

8:40 pm on Jan 12, 2021 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I wouldn't settle for less than fiberoptic Internet.


Some municipal areas have robust DSL as well as fiber ... and the cost difference between both can be crucial for some users. Just one of those market/audience things. :)

Example: my 24mb/s DSL has a monthly 1tb cap. The 100mb/s fiber has a cap of 500gb (and additional costs each 5gb over). Cost difference is more than 50% for the same service.

martinibuster

2:02 pm on Jan 13, 2021 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Some municipal areas have robust DSL...


Yes and no. Many of the big ISPs, including Verizon, no longer support new DSL accounts in rural areas. When a legacy DSL subscriber sells their home, the DSL to the house is cancelled. The next home owners do not have access to DSL. The reason is because they don't want to support copper anymore because of declining ROI on an old legacy technology.

[usatoday.com...]

martinibuster

2:12 pm on Jan 13, 2021 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



it is nothing at all close to what you describe.


Ah that's too bad. Maybe it's some kind of hybrid.

We have 1 Gigabit Internet to the home. I bought a Roku that has an Ethernet port so I could plug it straight into the router and have a faster load. Works great.

A few months back I needed to download a huge file so I connected my laptop to the router Ethernet and the file screamed down in crazy fast time, it was startling, never seen anything like it before, lol.