Title Character Relevancy How Many In Title? 63 or 100

seo,

[Ernest Hemingway]

Title Character Relevancy How Many In Title? 63 or 100
Hi All I stumbled upon this website here and hers my acknowledgment
I found this weblog it has over 100 charioters in the title of the site... but it has a pr 5 .... I mean how so? as for title bleeding and such ... I do recall reading about that and I was told by friend that title over saturation was bad idea although I found this here ... this is so crazy... im really trying to piece it together,,/... heres the URL example.net heres the Title <title>The example ¦ key1.0 key1.1 key1.2 ¦ key2.0 key2.1 key2.2 ¦ key3.0 key3.1 key3.2 ¦ key4.0 key4.1 ¦ key5.0 key5.1 key5.2</title>

can anyone share if this is okay in Titles 100 charictor ... it is a blog not website... it their any difference in tagging between blog and websites?

[edited by: eelixduppy at 2:54 pm (utc) on April 13, 2009]
[edit reason] exemplified [/edit]

[ogletree]

There is no evidence that too many characters in your title affect seo. As a matter of fact it can help. Worst case Google will ignore it at some point. You do want the fisrt 65-68 characters to be non spammy just to improve CTR. If you want to do a good test type in the last few words in the guys title and see if he ranks.

There is no such thing as Title bleeding.

[tangor]

A page title inside the document is what it is (no H involved). A page title (inside head) is limited. A title in an H is good for a bit of characters (and that's the query, I think) and then is truncated. Pick your poison.

I'm old school. If I can't title the document in six words or less then I've screwed up (about 30-40 characters).

There are TITLES and
Sub-Titles and
Adjectives Added to...

...create the illusion there is a really long title.