Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

U.S. High Court Rejects Virginia's Tough Anti-Spam Law

         

engine

4:21 pm on Mar 31, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



U.S. High Court Rejects Virginia's Tough [washingtonpost.com]Anti-Spam Law
The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday declined to consider reinstating Virginia's tough anti-spam law, leaving in place a lower court ruling that threw out the measure as unconstitutional.

The high court's decision ends the legal odyssey of the 2003 anti-spam law, one of the nation's first, which was intended to crack down on people who send masses of unwanted e-mail. The Virginia Supreme Court in September ruled that the law violated the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

But First Amendment scholars said the state court's decision was legally sound. In addition, Internet law experts said it is not likely to increase spam in Virginia because federal law also prohibits spam, spam filters screen out much of it and expert spammers often are out of the country. The Supreme Court, as is its custom, did not give a reason for declining to take the case.

bill

11:46 pm on Apr 10, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I can understand the redundancy angle, but I hope this rejection can't be used as precedent to quash other spam legislation.