Forum Moderators: phranque
So what gives?
The only less than usual trait I was able to spot with my initial visit was the sites choice of permalink structure and I'm wondering if he's benefiting because of the set-up.
Normal, or at least widely used, site structure
- www.example.com/somepage.html for pages
- www.example.com/category/somepage.html for categories
- www.example.com/date/archives/ for archives
This makes sense, each page is found deeper within the site are you dig in categories and archives. It's a natural structure.
This guys site structure is...
- www.example.com/date/archives/somepage.html for pages
- www.example.com/date/archives/ for archives
- www.example.com/date/archives/category for categories.
This basicaly says that everything can be found in the archives folder and he's used nofollow on many internal links which seems to be boosting his archives folder in theory. The archives folder thus becomes a link page or sitemap type of page with a link to every article.
My question - is the site structure he's using in some way telling the search engines that his archives folder is ultra important and as a result his articles are getting a boost because of the odd structure on those?
I don't expose Archives but I have a sitemap.xml.
There are many ways to set permalinks and the example you have seen isn't noteworthy. He may have achieved good PR sculpting but this shouldn't make much difference to ranking. Keep looking for other clues, such as the relevance of content, plugins used, etc.