Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

CMS and Needs

What CMS software

         

confusedxx

6:00 am on Nov 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi guys,

I currently have a Joomla site and I will need a load of modifications made to it as I am looking to enhance my site with a photo gallery, "hot property" method of selling animals, paypal integration, newsletter and a bit more.

I imagine this will cost me quite a bit and I know joomla will release a new version which will not be compatible with the old versions in the next few months. Since there is not as much support and plug-ins available for the new version of Joomla, I am wondering if now is a good time to change.

I hear from loads of developers and software engineers that PHP is horrible and I should really go with C# or Ruby on Rails. So far I have not seen any CMS package that can compare to Joomla and make a site that looks like my current site or can provide me the functionality I want.

Do you all know a good CMS alternative to look at? Is there any solid and ready for live Ruby on Rails CMS? What about dotnetnuke - is that really good or just another half-way CMS?

Thanks!

mayest

8:13 pm on Nov 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



You can still use Joomla 1.0x extensions in 1.5. There is a standard System - Legacy plugin that maintains compatibility. All you have to do is go to the plugin manager and enable it.

jtara

9:57 pm on Nov 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I hear from loads of developers and software engineers that PHP is horrible and I should really go with C# or Ruby on Rails.

PHP is horrible. It's also the most popular server-side scripting language. Go figure.

Developers tend to recommend what they know. The old "I've got a hammer, so everything is a nail" syndrome.

C# and ROR would take you in radically different directions. And I don't know of a popular, free CMS implemented in either.

C# locks you into the Microsoft world. It's fast, but I don't see any particular advantage over Java, which is more portable. Both are complete, rational high-level languages with good run-time compilers, which can give you very near to the same performance as true compiled code.

ROR is based on a wonderfully expressive language - Ruby - which has quite a way to go as far as implementation. That will change somewhat with the release of Ruby 2.0, which will use a bytecode interpreter instead of the current text interpreter. But it will still be way behind other languages in execution speed. (What with even Perl moving toward run-time compilation - if they ever release 6.0!)

I've cast my lot with ROR, as I think it's golden hour will correspond with critical mass for some sites I am developing. But I wouldn't recommend it for most sites today. It's great, though, if you need to do a conceptual demonstration of a site in a hurry.

I am sure that you can find plugins/modules/extensions for Joomla to do the things you want. As a previous poster pointed-out, these apparently will work in the newer version.