Forum Moderators: phranque
However, it is our intention to get these pages working well in search engines and we're unsure whether our current URL structure approach is the right one - so should we try and change both of these elements together?
For example our current URL structure for the landing pages is -
www.mywebsite.co.uk/my-destination.php
But would one of the following 2 options be a better solution and if so which one is better of the 2?
Option 1 - www.mywebsite.co.uk/my-destination/
Options 2 - www.my-destination.mywebsite.co.uk
If it is recommended that we change the URL structure to one of the 2 options, should we keep the original existing pages live until the new (structure) pages get indexed, and then once the new pages are indexed we re-direct (i.e. 301 or 302 redirect) the old pages to the new pages, or would this approach be deemed as duplicate content/spam?
Some help on this topic would be greatly appreciated.
Option #2 would probably get you in trouble. Sub-domains are considered separate domains. I don't think that's what you want to do.
However, you may want to keep in mind what the W3C says about URIs, "Cool URIs don't change [w3.org]". They've got some good reasoning for not changing addresses once you've published something. If that change can't be avoided a 301 redirect would probably be best.
I don't think changing your URL structure will make much difference either way.
Many thanks for your feedback, think i'm going to stick with what i currently have and simply tweek the content on the exisiting stucture to continue to improve our user experience...some pages are already performing in search engines so best to be patient and give it more time for the others to perform as well.