Washingtonpost.com Launches Reviewed.com Technology Reviews

[Brett_Tabke]

Congrats to long time WebmasterWorld supporters, members, pubcon attendess, and pubcon speakers at Reviewed.com:

[biz.yahoo.com...]

(BOSTON, MA) September 12, 2007 – washingtonpost.com, the award-winning news and information Web site, today launched a new technology reviews channel with Reviewed.com, a trusted publisher of consumer products reviews. Featured on washingtonpost.com’s technology section, Reviewed.com editors provide hands-on reviews with scientific, standardized testing, analysis and information.

Importantly, we at Reviewed.com have a culture that upholds the highest ethics and journalism standards, and this fits perfectly with the long history and tradition of great journalism at the Washington Post Company.” said Robin Liss, founder and chief executive of Reviewied.com.

You may also be aware of their other site, camcorderinfo.com [camcorderinfo.com] - the nets top destination for camcorder reviews.

Congrats Robin. It is always nice to see one of our own break out of the pack.

[engine]

Gongratulations Robin, excellent news.

[jbinbpt]

The Ads by Google look out of place right next to the Reviewed.com Ethics and Independence Pledge banner.

[RobinL]

Thanks Brett and everyone. I think this is an exciting step for the company, as we grow our brand and more and more people see the quality and standardized reviews we publish. And we have WebmasterWorld.com to thank for everything I know about online marketing!

[seth_wilde]

That's great news Robin! Congrats!

[bwnbwn]

opps found a bobo
[reviewed.com...]
Click on their ethics page [reviewed.com...]

They might want to get this fixed

Nice site they should have put it through our quality control review first. [webmasterworld.com...]

[RobinL]

Oooh, thanks for finding that... fixed it!

[carguy84]

I'm confused. This is a review aggregator, or? I'm very familiar with camcorderinfo.com but the products I searched for on reviewed.com only had links to other websites.?

[bwnbwn]

Robinl yes and no if you go to the ethics page the header is not correct I think it was a testing header and since then it has changed goes to this index page

/corporate/index2.php not sure you want that .

[RobinL]

No, it should say /corporate... that's the corporate site, or are you talking about something else?

[martinibuster]

Congratulations Robin!

[bwnbwn]

robin ok here is the url I am at but my question is how do I get back to the site [reviewed.com...] as all the links go to other pages even the logo will not go to the main page.
[reviewed.com...]

If this is the corporate site then I would open the Ethics link in a new window to keep people from getting lost.

[bhartzer]

Congratulations, Robin!

[bwnbwn]

I see now what is going on you have the ethics link on this page
[reviewed.com...] going to the wrong url.

[reviewed.com...]

it should be going to this url [reviewed.com...]

that will fix the issue.

[RobinL]

Thanks bhartzer. To me, both the ethics links point to the right URLs... maybe hard refresh?

[bwnbwn]

I deleted cookies closed all browsers reopend browser refreshed still seeing the same thing here is how I am getting to the page.
From the front page of reviewd.com I am clicking on the link to the right

"Reviewed.com Testing Labs" this is going to the above link in the TEXT on this page there is an ethics link NOT in the footer the footer link is correct it is the link in the text of the page.

This "ethics" link in the "text or body" of the page is incorrect.

[weeks]

Interesting and worthwhile service. I can see why the Washington Post found it appealing. Congrats to WP as well as Reviewed.com.

[rogerd]

Great news, Robin, congrats!

[Habtom]

Congrats Robin! That is a great news.

[sem4u]

Congratulations Robin! Good luck working with washingtonpost.com

[stuntdubl]

That rocks. Congrats Robin.