Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 52.91.39.106

Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Caution Urged By F.T.C. on Net Neutrality

     
5:49 pm on Jun 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:26118
votes: 949


The chairwoman of the Federal Trade Commission recommended on Wednesday against additional regulation of high-speed Internet traffic.

The chairwoman, Deborah Platt Majoras, said policy makers should proceed cautiously on the issue of “net neutrality,” which is the notion that all online traffic should be treated equally by Internet service providers.

In a statement issued Wednesday, Ms. Majoras said that without evidence of “market failure or demonstrated consumer harm, policy makers should be particularly hesitant to enact new regulation in this area.”

Caution Urged By F.T.C. on Net Neutrality [nytimes.com]

6:08 pm on June 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 27, 2001
posts:2548
votes: 0



without evidence of “market failure or demonstrated consumer harm,

So we should wait until all of the little guys are squashed and THEN do something about it?

Ms. Majoras’s comments provide support for telecommunications companies like AT&T

I seem to remember a company called AT&T getting in trouble a while back for being a communications monopoly. That couldn't happen again though, right? ;)

At least one 800 pound gorilla is fighting for us!
[google.com...]

6:34 pm on June 28, 2007 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 18, 2006
posts:139
votes: 0


You can't argue with physics.

Googles forward looking statements of knowing what we want and providing it before we know we want it wouldn't qualify as a problem would they?

4:23 pm on July 1, 2007 (gmt 0)

Preferred Member

10+ Year Member

joined:May 8, 2005
posts:408
votes: 0


The notion of "net neutrality" is not consumer friendly.

If big companies like Google want to clog the pipes with video and other hog type services they need to pay more for high availability connectivity. I don't want my connection to suffer because nitwits want to watch the latest "dog on skateboard" video.

If they (big companies) don't pay the cost of additional bandwidth and infrastructure costs, consumers will. Not sure how that fits into the "good for the user" mantra.

[edited by: TypicalSurfer at 4:28 pm (utc) on July 1, 2007]

 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members