Forum Moderators: phranque
Well, from my limited experience in the general art world, often the best thing to do to check color balance is to zoom in or something and make the colors you're thinking of be your whole world for a little while. Squint and check them for contrast (if you squint your eyes mostly closed, you reduce them to contrast, and can check it easily).
Then try doing some creative exercises like looking at the page sideways or upside down (works very well for paintings). Print them out or stand on your head, whichever suits you best.
I'm pretty bad with colors, which distresses me since I always thought i was pretty good with them. :-( So I'm struggling with this myself.
[edited by: olwen at 9:21 am (utc) on July 13, 2003]
Or if you'd rather be less cynical, check out colormatters.com.
:)
There must be someone you can call on for a second opinion - you dont need to be a graphic designer to know what looks good.
Well the colours aren't my biggest problem. The site has "golden" in it's name so blues and greens are kinda out the window. The problme is more the balance of hte page. Often I find the little edge details draw your attention most, and you end up expending effort jsut to see the title that's smack in the middle of the screen.
I think I've got a better arrangement now, completely different from my last one too.
I'm also a bit stumped, as the page has to display several bits of info, some of which may be missing for certain pages, and I'm struggling how do modify the template for datasets that are in some ways incomplete. currently I'm thinking about leaving the spaces for the missing items, but I could also reflow everything.
Do any of you have perhaps general design/balance of page/white space distribute hints that we can keep for me and others to read?
Thanks for your insights.
PS: I know exactly what you mean dragonlady. "please jsut look at this. Ah... Hm... [go off to code for 30 minutes and then be surprised they have left already]"
SN
I liken the whole process to mixing sound for a concert (which I do quite often). After the show I'll be talking to the band and we'll evaluate the show and inevitably we'll find issues with the sound balance or a song that they messed up on etc and start to get upset that we messed something up. The real truth of the matter tho is that 99% of the people sitting in the audience don't have the first clue what the song was supposed to sound like and have no idea we messed it up. Same thing goes for design - no one but you has that perfect picture in their head so when they look at the desigen they see what's there - we only see what's missing. It's a tough hurdle to get over. I'm not saying we shouldn't strive for perfection but most days 'it's good enough' will do.