Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Report: More Direct Navigation, Less Searching

         

rubble88

12:35 am on Feb 14, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Online from News.Com
"Web Surfers Snubbing Search Engines"
[news.com.com...]

From the article,
"Internet surfers are increasingly favoring direct navigation and bookmarks over search engines and Web links, according to a study released Wednesday. WebSideStory, a San Diego, Calif.-based company that measures Internet audiences, said that as of Feb. 6, nearly 52 percent of Web surfers arrived at sites by direct navigation and bookmarks, compared with about 46 percent during the same period last year."

You can read the complete Web Side Story news release at:
[websidestory.com...]

sean

1:02 am on Feb 14, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'll add that the average number of sites visited per week is estimated at between 6 [business2.com] and 19 [reports.netratings.com]. What does this mean?

People are creatures of habit.
People tighten their rotation of sites for efficiency.
People expand their rotation of sites when necessary.

but the question that is always raised...
the question that must always be raised...

How do 'new' sites get into the rotation?

brotherhood of LAN

1:15 am on Feb 14, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



1.the 50% or so that still use search engines
2.since we are creatures of habits, get links on sites your preferred type of visitors would visit

chiyo

1:26 am on Feb 14, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Remember that Webside story bases their data almost exclusively on sites using their Hit Box logging services. I don't think is too significant given sampling and generalisability problems. Hit Box users are certainly not generalisable to the general population of Web sites!

Then again, there seems to be more ad hoc evidence around that people are becoming disenchanted with Web search as a whole - those who say they "cant find what they are looking for" however are casual browsers using default installations and usually "sponsored" SERPS - MSN, AOL, etc. They dont know about Wisenut, AlltheWeb, Teoma, or maybe even Google. In fact talked to one UK based CEO whose company puts a significant amount of money into a web prescence who had never heard of Google last month.

sean

2:01 am on Feb 14, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Efficient searching could also skew the numbers in ways that are not obvious. For example,

* a newbie searches ten times unsuccessfully before finding a site worthy of being added to the Favorites folder.

* an oldbie searches successfully on the first attempt and re-visits the Favorite site nine more times while the newbie is still searching.

They both found the site, but the searching/navigation ratio is very different. The second scenario also represents a shift towards maximimum total revenue within an industry... and higher stakes for being found at the top of the heap.

Josk

9:44 am on Feb 14, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Wouldn't this mean that its best for relevent serps to returned, not just those with most money.

Reality Check: But that would be common sense now wouldn't it?

Marcia

10:33 am on Feb 14, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Part of that could be that people have been on the net longer. When looking for something in particular, it may take drilling down through 5 or 10 pages or more to find the specific. Not that the other sites aren't good, but they may not have exactly what someone is specifically looking for, which is a good argument for the benefit of optimizing sites down to the level of specifics. When I search and finally hit that tenth page, after going through the broader category, and find exactly what I'm looking for, I'll bookmark it. No need to search for that again if I've found exacty what I'm looking for.

That may be for something like a slide show script. Same thing when I first started and went looking for graphics. I had to search and search before finding good ones. After going through many, many pages at a search engine, when I'd find a really good site I'd bookmark it.

When there's a good bookmark collection in many categories, there's less need to use a search engine for those unless it's for a specific that hasn't made its way into the bookmarks yet. Not so when people are new users, it takes a long time to gather up a good bookmark collection.

Almost all were found through search engines in the first place, and most likely a lot of other people bookmarked those same sites. So naturally, after a site has been around for a while it'll have been bookmarked a lot and the percentage arriving through search engines will be less.

Looking for those is not exactly a shopping experience, which is different. When shopping for a book, someone won't necessarily go to a search engine to look for "books about fishing," they'll go to a site that sells books, and the site with the best branding will win - they'll type it into the address bar without even needing to go to bookmarks. But if they're looking for "fishing gifts for men" they'll have to search on that, or search for fishing tackle or equipment. However, if they want something unique like a crystal paperweight or snowglobe with a marlin inside, they've got a tough searching job on their hands. If they ever find a well optimized site with a page that's been optimized for fishing gifts, which is *precisely* what I would do if I were doing a site about gifts for men, they'll bookmark it. Then they'll go back for Christmas if they found their guy's birthday gift there. So SEO helps the end user in the long run.

>Wouldn't this mean that its best for relevent serps to returned, not just those with most money

It certainly would from the searcher's point of view, Josk. And it may possibly be practical after all in gaining favor. It's purely conjecture, but that may be one of the reasons Overture's new rules require that the link go directly to the page that applies to the keyword instead of the main index page that's more broad and general. From the searchers perspective it'll make those Overture listings more valuable by saving them time hunting through sites they click on. It's just a guess, but maybe it's possible people have been passing those up to some degree to find pages that are more specific. It can get very tiring to keep finding the same 3 general pages in the listings for multiple searches.

That article may have limited value in view of the source of the data, but it makes a good case for doing up a sites that are worth bookmarking.