Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.146.221.231

Forum Moderators: IanTurner & engine

Message Too Old, No Replies

Plans Announced For UK to Get Better Internet When Travelling

     
10:31 am on Jan 22, 2014 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:22313
votes: 239


It's needed, for sure. Unless you're in a major city, Internet connectivity on-the-go is still very poor.


People on boats, planes and trains could soon enjoy fast broadband on their travels after Ofcom approved the use of new satellite technology.

The UK telecoms regulator has given the green light to the use of so-called earth stations on moving vehicles.

The devices connect to a geostationary satellite orbiting above the equator.

But critics suggest Ofcom should be concentrating on bringing home-broadband services up to speed before focusing on transport.Plans Announced For UK to Get Better Internet When Travelling [bbc.co.uk]
Speeds could be reach around 50Mbps (megabits per second) to a single earth station, which would mean speeds of more than 10Mbps for individual passengers.


That speed quoted is something we can only dream about. For some, it's way faster than they get at home.

"The real solution for internet connectivity on the move in the UK is for there to be a concerted effort to ensure that all the rail network has access to 2G, 3G and 4G services," said Andrew Ferguson, founder of broadband news site ThinkBroadband.


That seems a much better solution for transport systems.
12:18 pm on Jan 22, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member beedeedubbleu is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 3, 2004
posts: 6099
votes: 6


Personally I am willing to put up with ropey broadband when traveling. I agree with the critics that home broadband should be the priority.

(I use superfast cable so I personally don't have a problem.) ;)
12:29 pm on Jan 22, 2014 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:22313
votes: 239


Ropey! I'd say that it's not that reliable outside of the major towns. If you're trying to work while travelling it can be very bad, and that's lost productivity, ultimately helping lose the country money.
2:37 pm on Jan 22, 2014 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member piatkow is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Apr 5, 2006
posts:3284
votes: 12


3G on my phone or with a dongle is fine for me. If I want a movie on the move I'll download it first or get a DVD.

I don't like "free" wifi as it just means signing up for spam. If only my mobile provider would give me 100% coverage.

Actually I get better speeds at home in a commuter village than afriend does in east London with the same provider. Just fewer people on the line I imagine.
6:20 pm on Jan 23, 2014 (gmt 0)

Administrator from GB 

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:May 9, 2000
posts:22313
votes: 239


Many of the places I travel to have very limited Internet coverage. Sometimes, there not even a phone signal!

When you have a concentration of customers on, for example, a train, it should be easier to arrange for cell coverage.

Downloading a movie ought to be a lower priority to actually getting some coverage, imho.