Forum Moderators: open
/claus
These are the one I liked:
I think they should set up a service where they store personal documents for you and make them easily searchable for information you need - all online of course.
Payable by the storage Megabyte - I'd join yesterday.
Offer a free or modest (<$25/yr) fee to set up personal profiles - let users put in sets of keywords/areas of interest and Google can monitors traffic/interest along with site content changes and present summary of “activity” within the areas of interest you define (and refine over time). I suppose it could do email notifications like the tool they have in BETA.
Site content changes within my interest field and absolutely new content pages would interest me. I'm not sure how happy siteowners would be with that type of googlebot though..
Add a forum for people who search on the same keyword or series of keywords (and want to be listed) can talk (to compare notes on specific topics, etc)
Show me your (annotated) bookmarked pages on this "search phrase" and I'll show you mine (anonymously if wished). I do not have to post or reply if I'm shy - but I have a sense of community in my interest field. Voting possible.
Looks more like a poorly coded script filling the meta description tag.
<meta name="description" content="<a href="http://images.fastcompany.com/blog/googledo.pdf>What Should Google Do?</a> is Internet marketing and strategy guru Seth Godin's latest thought experiment. A 77-page PDF brainstorming session by Godin and readers of <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/">his blog</a> on how the dominant search engine can build a better tomorrow. It's a fast-paced, sometimes exhilarating read as people toss out ambitious and imaginative ideas on how to make Google even more indispensable.">
The hrefs broke it.
I wouldn't say offending exactly, rather i didn't check the code and it seemed like an abstract put there on purpose, loading a fair bit faster than the rest of the page (and being read by robots before navigation and so on), so i thought (wrongfully) that this was intended to be so and i actually thought it might even be a smart idea in some cases.
It turns out that i simply made a mistake, i'm sorry about that. As you can see in Dolemites post, you seem to lack an ending " in your link code, that apparently did it ;)
/claus
-- Brian
