Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

What's the definitive on image maps - good or bad for SEO?

         

engine

12:26 pm on Feb 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



What's the definitive on image maps and SEO? Assuming there are no other HTML links (for example, at the bottom of the page).

In here, [webmasterworld.com] Buckworks says Search engines don't like 'em.

In here, [webmasterworld.com] Fathom says that it's rubbish.

According to the information I have, the mainstream search engines will have no problem with image maps.

So, anyone with firm evidence either way?

fathom

12:28 pm on Feb 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I stand by my word...

The only major consideration is visitor usability... or the image load-time if a huge image is used. :)

As far as Buckworks suggestion -- Google indexes images & Google indexes links -- don't see anything different with a image map.

HitProf

1:13 pm on Feb 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm with fanthom. Don't forget to use alt and title tags properly.

<area href="keyword.htm" coords="123,45,678,90" shape="rect" alt="keyword" title="keyword">

[edited by: HitProf at 1:45 pm (utc) on Feb. 24, 2003]

fathom

1:26 pm on Feb 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Actually HitProf the a href="" doesn't use alt="" as alt="" is for image replace text.

<img height="160" width="376" src="Bot.jpg" border="0" usemap="#Bot2eec3" alt="Image text">

<map name="Bot2eec3">

<area href="intro12.html" coords="113, 108, 158, 157" shape="rect" target="_top" title="link anchor text"></a></map>

Oh it's fathom not fantom but thanks just the same

HitProf

2:06 pm on Feb 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hi fanthom,

I hope I have your name right now, corrected it in the other post as well.

Actually HitProf the a href="" doesn't use alt=""

That's correct but 'area href' is slightly different from 'a href'.

According to W3C alt even is a <b>required</b> attribute!

[w3schools.com...]

Most browsers don't display the alt tag, but even when it doesn't help, it doesn't hurt either. I think we agree on the title tag.

fathom

7:43 pm on Feb 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Thanks HitProf - Had assumed that alt="for the img src" was all that was required since the map was an overlay of the image.

The alt attribute must be specified for the IMG and AREA elements. It is optional for the INPUT and APPLET elements.

But now see that Alt="" must be used to validate area href.

Excellent point! Thanks again :)

hmmm... still got that handle wrong though ;)

andreasfriedrich

8:03 pm on Feb 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I´m with fantom fathom and hOtprIf HitProf on this one ;). Client side image maps are easily parsed by spiders. Server sider client maps are not.

Andreas

HitProf

8:30 pm on Feb 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



LOL

Never noticed I was dyslectic before!

And no owner edit tag to pretend I never was :(