Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from

Forum Moderators: phranque

Message Too Old, No Replies

Can pagination hurt or help SEO / SEM?

What are the ramifications of pagination?

5:16 pm on Apr 10, 2009 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:Apr 7, 2009
posts: 2
votes: 0

I've been wondering (worrying) about whether to make a simple change to our content - paginating the our photos page. I'd like to know what ramifications it will have before making the change.

Currently we have a photos pages that shows every photo we have for a person on one page. I'd like to change the layout to show only one photo at a time per page with 'Next' and 'Previous' buttons.

I'm worried about what that change will do to:
1) SEO / SEM
2) usability
3) ad value
4) page rank

Making the change would drive up number of pageviews, and therefor more ads will get displayed. But it will also drive down the average time per page.

Also, I assume a user would rather look at pagenated content than scroll through long pages, but what does that do to SEO when the content per page goes down but the number of pages in the sitemap remain the same?

(My apologies if this is posted in the wrong forum. Newbie here.)

8:21 pm on May 17, 2009 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 26, 2000
votes: 0

Hello Seymour, and welcome to the forums. Sorry your excellent post went without a reply for so long.

You asked several questions, and they do fall into several possible forums. But each question would benefit from actual testing and research, rather than opinion, so this may indeed be a good place (even if quieter) to take on all those issues in one thread.

I've done some research with pagination, scrolling and so on. In my study, there was a sweet spot - we found optimium page views when scrolling was at around 4-5 screens worth of scrolling per page. Fewer than that and the visitors did not go as far into the content, on average. More than that and they abandoned the content sooner as well.

While this study was not done over many sites, it seemed that users neither want to click "too much" nor did they want to scroll "too much". But we are no longer in the era of "I don't want to scroll at all".

The study was not looking at ad display - and clearly a lot will depend on whether you are getting paid by the impression or by the clickthrough.

I'd say a lot depends on the goals for this change. Usability can often work AGAINST ad clicks - people who are "into" the content are not as likely to leave by clicking on an ad.

There may be no answer ahead of time for you - you may need to take some baseline measures and then try out various changes.

3:10 am on June 26, 2009 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:June 18, 2009
votes: 0

A very interesting topic, let me chime in. First I'd like to say good question, and good initial answer tedster.

The number of 4-5 screens of pagination makes sense to me, I personally wouldn't typically click more than 3 - 4 'next' pages.

There are several advantages of having fewer posts per page:

1) Quicker page loading

2) Less Dilution of Content

3) Makes Page Easily Scannable

Remember, web users have a short attention span (around 8 seconds) on a first glance of a page, making a big impression at the start through solid content and appealing design goes a long way.

Page loading isn't necessarily a deal maker if its fast, but it always is a deal killer if slow. I've personally cut my posts down to 9 per page.

The way I see it, pagination is just another navigation channel for the web visitor. But then again, EVERYTHING on a website is a navigation element, so make pagination simple, and don't ignore other areas of your site for usability.