Toggle navigation
Dashboard
Dashboard Tracker
Add / Edit My Forums
System Announcements
Discussion
Active Thread Feed
Top Threads Today
Top Threads This Week
Top Threads Library
Go!
View All
View All
Login
Logout
Home
Forums Index
General SEO Issues
/
Sitemaps, Meta Data, and robots.txt
10:12 pm Jul 21, 2026
This page requires javascript.
Forum Moderators:
goodroi
Message Too Old, No Replies
Google, Bing and Yahoo agree on Microformats?
Was that discussed here: schema.org?
pontifex
Msg#:4321567
3:00 pm on Jun 3, 2011
(gmt 0)
On schema.org - a google registered domain - they state:
Search engines including Bing, Google and Yahoo! rely on this markup
important read, but i am not sure if it was mentioned here?
P!
Propools
Msg#:4321575
3:33 pm on Jun 3, 2011
(gmt 0)
Yeah, I got an email from LinkedIn this morning about it.
I'm trying to cypher through it now.
Looks good though.
I wonder if it will be something close akin to sitemaps.org?
The two sites, side by side do look awfully similar.
Leosghost
Msg#:4321576
3:38 pm on Jun 3, 2011
(gmt 0)
[
webmasterworld.com
...]
Propools
Msg#:4321577
3:41 pm on Jun 3, 2011
(gmt 0)
Oh, I just tried to gen a 404 error on the site to see what the 404 error page looked like and it's a cool Google 404 page.
coopster
Msg#:4321782
11:00 pm on Jun 3, 2011
(gmt 0)
Thanks,
Leosghost
:
Discusssion continues here
[webmasterworld.com]
Join The Conversation
Register
For Free! -
Become a
Pro Member
!
See forum categories
-
Enter the Forum
Moderators and Top Contributors
Moderator List
| Top Contributors:
This Week
,
This Month
,
Jun
,
May
,
Archive
,
Top 100 All Time
,
Top Voted Members
Hot Threads This Week
July 2026 Google Search Observations
Annoying Crawler, Bot, or what?
Suspicious visitors
Do you still build external links in 2026?
How to find out why a page is suddenly popular?
Home
Forums Index
General SEO Issues
/
Sitemaps, Meta Data, and robots.txt
10:12 pm Jul 21, 2026