Are you taking the MSNbot Gamble?

how much bandwith are you allowing

[gniland]

The MSNbot has quite a voracious appetite for spidering websites. Some webmasters love it and try to feed it as much as possible. Other webmasters don't see any reason to use up bandwith for a search engine that doesn't currently exist.

Personally, bandwith is cheap for me and I'm willing to feed MSNbot as long as it doesn't impact performance for users.

So how much bandwith are you allowing?

[linuxguy]

Welcome msndude, feel at home and give a try to Linux baby!

[vabtz]

Seriously.. bandwidth is cheap so if your on a host thats stingy with it thats your fault.

The bot is a good thing.

Just like I HATE Microsofts monopoly on the desktop I hate Googles in the search world. I sincerly hope M$ makes inroads in this area and gets knocked on their butt with their OS

[moishe]

Welcome msndude
well shoot, I thought someone at MS just liked me when I saw their new bot pounding my site, second only to G this month and Yohoo nowhere to be seen. I just hope their new SE starts feeding results to MSN soon so all this bandwidth is not wasted, (hint hint)
A timeline maybe?

[Rosalind]

There's some case for a meta tag specific to the MSNBot, like the revisit-after tag, except the other way around: Do not visit before. I don't mind Google or Yahoo spidering daily, but I don't want to see MSNBot more than once every three or four days, at least until it's serving a live search engine. Every site varies as to what it can handle, and this would be an excellent way for webmasters to set limits.

Around 40% of my traffic is bots, and that hasn't varied a great deal with the growth of overall traffic. Most of that is Googlebot. Add another major spider to the equation, and we're talking an extra 30% or so in bandwidth with no extra visitors to support the cost. Now I'm doing okay, but if those kinds of percentages are at all common, there are going to be a lot of people taking issue with it. So how about those meta tags, msndude?

[plumsauce]

You'll recall the claim was made that there was this upper limit:
4,294,967,296 (2^32) URLs.

ms will likely not have this problem, as they are probably built on top of the 64 bit version of windows server. and sql server, if this is the data engine can handle 64 bits without problem.

at least msnbot will follow a new internal link if it sees it, while google studiously ignores new internal links while concentrating on respidering things like contacts.htm several times a day.

no room in the "new links" database?

[przero2]

welcome MSNdue - a relief to see you here. And of course, we love the fact that you are crawling deeply all of our sites. Wish you the best in providing healthy competition to Google.

---

continued here:
[webmasterworld.com...]