Forum Moderators: mack

Message Too Old, No Replies

New MSN Search is LIVE

We are seeing a rollout of MSN new search

         

drdsl2000

3:20 pm on Jan 14, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



continued from: [webmasterworld.com...]


It looks like it might be tied into their lateset Windows update.

Results look very good so far, Look out Google!

AND THERE WAS THREE

The Dr

The Contractor

9:17 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



This beta results on FireFox thing is finally making me to use FireFox after years of I

It's not the browser triggering it... at least not for me. I have tried FireFox, FireBird, Opera, IE, and Netscape 7.x - I still get Yahoo results. Only by going directly to the beta search can I get the beta results...

BillyS

9:22 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I'm not so sure the version we are seeing on Firefox is the real deal.

I've tried some rather complex queries, not the simple one or two word phrases a webmaster might be looking at to see how they rank. I mean one of those longer queries that people type in...

I've tried several that good sense and show results on the old search, nothing on the new search at all. To many of these and people will run from this search engine:

Search tips:

* Try similar words. For example, some sites may use "film" instead of "movie".
* Make your search more general. For example, instead of using a specific product name, try typing the generic product category or manufacturer.

dvduval

9:24 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It's not the browser triggering it... at least not for me. I have tried FireFox, FireBird, Opera, IE, and Netscape 7.x - I still get Yahoo results. Only by going directly to the beta search can I get the beta results...

Here is Atlanta, GA, I am seeing Yahoo in IE and the new MSN in FF.

shopgal

10:25 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Results look good, we'll continue monitoring over next the next few weeks and then most likely switch over our isp search. Majority of our customer sites, pages and keywords are now back geographically where they once were. bye google


2by4

10:47 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I wish I could join in the celebration but I have yet to see any beta results, in any browser, from either msn.com or search.msn.com

IP based seems right.

Steveb, for a while I thought you were being too harsh on the new msn beta, but I'm starting to think you're seeing it pretty clearly. I think I fell for some illusion that suggested that content was being given a higher rank, but now I think that was a mistake. We are after all talking about one of the least creative corporate computing cultures in existence here.

mikec

10:52 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)



either some of you are on drugs or you're just happy that your sites may be ranking well, but msn has the WORST serps hands down out of the big 3. i'm not saying this because my sites are doing poorly, quite the contrary. many are in the top 10, but when i see garbage link directories that i set up for a link campaign ranking higher than the site, i cringe. who cares if you're sites in the top 10 if it's surrounded by crap! I mean they have very few (if they have them, they suck!) spam filters or any sort of filters in. it's cake to get your site to #1. I submitted a detailed report to msn yesterday calling out a few serps specifically and explaining to them the exact (very beginner, almost 90s style) blackhat seo they were doing. Am I doing this to be a rat? hell no, I want the serps to be good so people will actually have an alternative to google. Who cares if my site ranks well in msn? If the results suck and are filled with spam nobody is going to use it! What good will a good ranking do then? also, until msn.com becomes a more search orientated site I have trouble seeing it competing with either yahoo or google.

2by4

10:56 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



"but msn has the WORST serps hands down out of the big 3."

I agree, I can't believe MS is going live with this now, it's completely useless for any real searches. Maybe one out of 5 is good. But it is very consistent. IE 1, 2, and 3 were the worst major browsers out there. then they got it right, and 4 was the best available. They've done that with almost every area they've entered from scratch, it's their formula, put out anything for version 1, then wait for the MS backed inertia to start building market share, improve product each version, until it finally actually works. Crush opposition by making it cheaper or free. Cut into profit centers of competition, as dvduval very astutely pointed out the msn beta serps are already designed to do.

MS is nothing if not predictable. Here I was thinking that they would actually try to put out a good product for the first release, they've never done that, why start now?

However, that little bird has only about 36 hours to be right by my count, still no sign of beta results for me.

mikec

11:07 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)



I've found one simple tactic that seems to make it cake to SPAM their serps in the beta version. I'm also tempted to post it in hopes that they'd fix it...but what am i thinking?! it's microsoft...

if they rush this product out and it sucks, they are such idiots. talk about a waste of promotions and publicity. people we'll see this crap and go right back to google.

2by4

11:20 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



"people we'll see this crap and go right back to google."

that's how I was thinking about it too. But then I realized, no, that's not what's going to happen. What will happen is that the current userbase of msn, the ones too clueless to use a non msn product, the ones that stuck with the browser defaults their machine came with, will keep doing that. As long as the results are halfway useable they will suffer very little marketshare loss.

But they'll do live testing, and start building the next version, or tweaking this one. Maybe by next year MSN will be putting out results good enough to start attracting new users. Or maybe even by this summer if it's designed for flexible tweaking. They have patience, this doesn't need to take off now, it just needs to be barely good enough to let them start working on it with real user data.

Then, if Google keeps messing up, in 6 months msn can start advertizing, like, hey, new sites listed. no directory pages [ok, that's optimistic :-)] etc. I see the commercial like this: ms type fantasy girl is at computer, turns to boyfriend, says, hey, how come I cna't find the new website for that movie when I search for that new movie. Boyfriend turns to her and says, oh, well, you know, google doesn't have new websites. Didn't you know that? Try MSN, it has all the new stuff.

dvduval

11:25 pm on Jan 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Think about how crappy MSN was a year ago with Looksmart, Inktomi and Overture. MSN is way better now. This is a great start for them. And to think...people were using them a year ago too. ;)
This 245 message thread spans 25 pages: 245