Forum Moderators: travelin cat
At Compusa I've sold so many Macs that I've actually convinced myself. :) This is especially after seeing my Mac customers and their satisfaction. Windows users seem much less satisfied with their experiences.
I have some questions:
I am a power user that needs quick response times and efficiency on the web for multitasking and web design.
1) Will adding a Kingston 512 mb ram chip increase the gui response and loading programs more quickly? It seems a tad bit sluggish for opening things like Safari and iTunes.
2) Can I multitask as efficiently with OS X versus Windows? I need to rapidly switch between programs- I want the best virtual ergonomics and usability. It seems like Mac users have extreme usage of key commands, vs Windows users? Is this true?
Many people say Macs are easier to learn, but Windows was never hard for me to learn anyway. I hope Mac OS isn't simpler but lacking in features and ergonomics.
I'm looking forward to my experiences with this wonderful platform, just a little daunted, temporarily :)
Please clue me in,
Thanks- Jesse
2) OSX multi tasks great. You can switch applications with Command + Tab just like windows, although a neat trick is that while switch apps you can hit the Q key and quit them. This is a real time savor.
Macs are easy to learn, just look around, see all the different key commands and enjoy.
BZ
Other than that, my experience with Mac is they are better as far as cross-platform (networking with windows-based machines), they're a little more fun for your eyes, and they are easy to use for the end-user. Last and most important in my line of work, if one application quits, 99% of the time it will not take your system down with it. Just restart the application, and away you go.
The actual system takes a bit of getting used to, esp. if you're used to the DOS command line. Moving to UNIX is quite different indeed.
Like I said, the only problem I've ever had is the RAM issue. But even that was trivial.
-- Zak
It seems like Mac users have extreme usage of key commands, vs Windows users? Is this true?
Yes, the difference with Mac keyboard shortcuts is that they're quick and easy: you know, like a shortcut.
And beyond the old chestnut "RAM is always good," if you like to have lots of apps and windows open, then you definitely shouldn't skimp on the RAM.
welcome to this great resource, we just bougt 2 20" imac g5's upgraded from G4 and G3.... what a speed difference!
Two things will help:
1. get a Meg of Ram since there are only 2 ram slots. You will see a difference.
2. Go to the system preferences, click on "Energy Saver", then choose "Options" make sure that "Processor Performance" is set at highest (it defaults to automatic). This was a little trick I picked up from MacAddict magazine and it made a difference...
Have fun with your new machine.
Another hint:
Go to Applications, open "Utilities" and launch "Activity Monitor" lots of good info there, click on "System Memory" on the bottom and you will see how much real and virtual memory your g5 is using.
Mine is currently using 21.84 mb of real memory iTunes and 57.31 for Safari... that eats up a lot of stuff b4 you even launch Dreamweaver... I use GoLive and it is using 89.91 mb.
It will be great to run most of my programs straight from ram w/out using much slower virtual memory.
Now if my iPaq PDA will just sell on Ebay, I can go ahead and buy the ram :)
No one has mentioned the Apple problem with their text editors. I'm not even sure what the problem is exactly ... something about Apple using "\r" instead of "\n".
What I do know is that using SimpleText or Appleworks (in text) for HTML or PHP doesn't work always. One needs to download BBEdit or some other third party application.
With everything else Apple being so superior, seems a strange self-annialation habit.
something about Apple using "\r" instead of "\n".
Ah yes, OS X's split personality for line endings. Yes it's a common gotcha', so here's the scoop:
Some GUI Mac apps still use Mac OS 9 style line endings, which are carriage return (CR, ASCI: 13).
Apple's Unix-style applications, e.g., Apache and PHP, prefer Unix-style line endings: line feed (LF, ASCII: 10).
The default Apache install on Mac OS X can cope with HTML (or PHP, if that is on) files with either kind of line ending.
The caveat is that CR files might not work well in other situations, e.g., if you are using the PHP command line tool to debug a page, or you upload the file to a Linux server (for example) in a way that the line endings don't get translated automatically.
With everything else Apple being so superior, seems a strange self-annialation habit.
I'd count developing a web site in AppleWorks or TextEdit as a self-annihilation habit. Download a free text editor if you like, but BBEdit's worth it.
One of the next things I did was upgrade to the newest version of BBEdit, and set it to use Unix line endings by default.
Of course, now I'm looking at the newest powerbooks, and the minis, and thinking, "Gee, I wonder how much better it would be if I had a brand NEW one..." but the fact is I really don't need it.
It's one of those programs that continually evokes the feeling of "It can do that too?!?". It's awesome.