Forum Moderators: travelin cat
* save As... (with all objects)
* select-All (Ctrl-A), Copy, Paste (with all objects)
* saving image with temporarily disabled JavaScript
* delete all cache and then browse site and go to cache dir
* run custom crawler that can download whole site
* view source and manually get URL for images, then save them
* etc etc etc
There is nothing more annoying then right click disabled that prevents from accessing other than "Save As" common functionality.
You can make it pretty difficult by creating a table the same size as your image and adding the image as the table background.
Actually this just given me an idea - how about programmatically splitting image into number of small images that will be combined in a table to create illusion that it is a single image - saving it all manually would produce X images that will have to be combined. Now that would be pretty annoying!
>>You can also use this program to protect your online images from unauthorized downloading with Secure Image mode. [imagecure.com...]
I am not familiar with this program or site but you may want to check it out.
This would overcome any rollover issues as well as slicing. Face it, Mac's are great for many things.... including stealing artwork...
You can do the above just using keyboard commands.
;)
Yes, but you are assuming that most users know what a screen capture is!
I think most Mac users do -- at least the ones savvy enough to collect Web pictures. Macs have had screen capture longer than they've had color monitors.
IMHO, you can't beat good old-fashioned thumbnails and ugly watermarks. Once you send the pixels to their computer, they'll keep them if they want to.
IMHO, you can't beat good old-fashioned thumbnails and ugly watermarks. Once you send the pixels to their computer, they'll keep them if they want to.
Perfectly agree. I wonder what this tread has to do with webmastering on a Mac?
I suggest you consult the Content, Writing and Copyright forum's library [webmasterworld.com] to confirm what timster just said.
Well, of course a physical watermark would be the bulletproof solution
Watermarks dont help prevent theft - theifs might not even know images were watermarked or even significance of watermarking! Watermarks are useful to prove fact of ownership, ie prove fact of them when thief is caught. If someone takes your image and inserts into internal reports then chances are you will never know.
theifs might not even know images were watermarked or even significance
I was referring to a visible watermark, like the word "sample" embossed across the image.
Of course, the goal here is to maximize revenue; minimizing theft is just a means to that end.
Consider how many people might meet these criteria:
(1) Want to steal your photos
(2) Too clueless to figure out how
(3) Can't get a techie to help
(4) Will buy the image if they fail to steal it
If your interested in stopping those folks, any good javascript image swapping script will do.
Cheers.