Forum Moderators: travelin cat

Message Too Old, No Replies

Panther News

Estimated Release Date for Panther

         

aaronjf

4:17 pm on Jul 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



EWeek is reporting that Panther is on track for a Mid September release, along with some other interesting tid bits about Panther and the new 64 Bit IBM Chip.

Panther Release [eweek.com]

<added> I especially loved the Windows advertisement that comes up on the page </added>

aaronjf

4:22 pm on Jul 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



<added> Interesting that Panther will hit stores just a couple of weeks after the expected ship date of the G5. I hope Apple will be nice enough to offer a free copy to the people that rush out and buy a G5 before the Panther release. That would be really shady if they did not. </added>

glengara

4:25 pm on Jul 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



My money's on really shady.

aaronjf

4:28 pm on Jul 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Related Stories

Panther Sever [extremetech.com]

aaronjf

4:29 pm on Jul 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I would have to agree. Since Jobbs has been taking some many notes from Gates in the past two years.

dragonlady7

5:41 pm on Jul 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>My money's on really shady.

My boyfriend bought a laptop around the time 10.2 came out. It had 10.1 on it. And he was given a discount to upgrade. 10.2 cost him something around $20. I'd assume they'll do the same for 10.3... They know which side their bread's buttered on.

Thanks for the heads-up, aaronjf!

TheRealTerry

9:29 pm on Jul 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



What notes, pray tell, did Steve take from Billy? Seems to me that MS and other Wintel companies have been ripping off, in poorly executed facsimiles, basically everything Apple has ever done.

Have you seen the new silver 12inch Dell notebooks? How much more blatant can you be? Glad you asked:

[home.cfl.rr.com...]

Don't even get me started on BuyMusic! Even the ads are copied!

aaronjf

10:27 pm on Jul 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



TheRealTerry,

Technology wise yes, to a large degree you are correct. But, you missed the meaning behind the content. I was reffering to business practices. M$ has charged for every little thing since the begining - out to get as much as they could squeeze from consumers. Up until the last two years, Apple has been a little more giving in the consumer relations. In short Apple is becoming a lot more aggresive.

TheRealTerry

7:03 pm on Jul 31, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think a lot of that is a misconception spawned from the .Mac service. People just assumed Apple created the service as a freebie from the get go and would maintain expensive banks of servers and bandwidth indefinitely. I was pretty sure it was a market test from the beginning to test the waters. They had the whole idea of combining internet usage and digital devices using your Mac as a hub for it all mapped all for a while. They needed a suite of online services and .Mac was the solution.

They probably would offer it for free as an incentive if bandwidth and server maintenance wasn't an ongoing cost for them. They can develop a browser or music software for a set amount and let people download it as much as they like for really no more cost to them. Great incentive to move to Mac. However, to give out free email and hosting would be beneficial at first to sell a machine, but as the years go by and the cost pile up per user, they have to recoup their expenditures. Really, at less than $10 a month the nice integration of .Mac with OS is really a great value.

People are just upset they didn't get a free lunch when they thought they would and they call "Micro-Foul".

The other point might be the development of their own browser, but that comparison doesn't hold water as it was spawned from Explorer for Mac being treated like MS's red-headed step child and never getting the features and updates of the Windows version. They finally just killed the sick dog. Besides, if you don't like Safari all you have to do is drag one icon to the trash and it's gone. No OS integration there.

aaronjf

8:44 pm on Jul 31, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Uhhhh, ok... I am reffering to the good old days when Apple had a free tech support number - still works if you have been around long enough to know it - and other ammenities that MS would never dream of. .Mac is a very recent development.

Apple also used to be very good about only asking people to pay for entirely new system updates, lik from 7- 8 not for 7.1 - 7.9.

I don't think Mac users are neccesarily complaining about not getting a free lunch. In this particular thread we are complaining that they are no longer giving us the free crackers with our lunch we bought.

<added> even more specifically. We were talking about how shady it would be to have customers buy a brand new machine then two weeks later release a new OSv and ask customers to pay for it.</added>

TheRealTerry

2:20 pm on Aug 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Sure, but then they are damned if they do, damned if they don't. If they don't put the machine out soon enough, people complain. If they don't get the OS out soon enough, people complain. If you bought a machine with Jaguar, you bought a machine with Jaguar. You can always wait for the next OS if you like. They shouldn't feel obligated to give a discount even, but they probably will.

I guess I'm not seeing the entitlement when the release date for Panther, is, well, the release date for Panther. It's not coming out on X date for everyone except you guys who bought a computer X -10 days. Where's the cut off? When you bought your most recent machine? How about when I bought my most recent machine? What about some person who bought one 3 years ago? Why should 1 week be any different than 1 year when the OS is being released on a certain date? Should they suspend all computer sales for a month previous just so people won't have grounds to complain they got "ripped-off" because they made the mistake of buying their machine before the next OS came out? There's always going to be a new OS coming out.

Should people have gotten a free upgrade to a G5 if they bought a G4 1 day before the G5 was available? Should Ford give people 2004 cars for the price of this years models because they bought just before the new models arrived? The logic just does not work.

dragonlady7

2:43 pm on Aug 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes. I made a conscious decision to go ahead and buy my new computer even though I knew new hardware was coming out and the prices would probably drop. I also knew a new OS was coming out that I'd have to buy. I understood that, but I weighed against that the fact that I wanted a new computer _now_, and that was _my_ problem, not Apple's.
So I bought a brand new iMac at full price a month ago with 10.2 and I'm going to have to pay to upgrade to 10.3, and the same computer will cost less in six months or less. So? I have it, I like it, I'm happy. That's how it is.
It would be something else entirely if they misled the buyers of the new G5s into believing that they'd be getting 10.3 when they're not. That would be shady.

aaronjf

3:10 pm on Aug 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Cars are a bad example. You know when a car is coming out, same time every year. Plus, car makers don't release a vehicle then two weeks later say - Oh here is the right engine of that car, but if you were one of the die hard customers how bought the day it came out, to bad.

A lot of Panther was designed to take advangate of the new 64 bit chip and redesigned architecture of the G5. Sure we all know - especially these days and more so in the future - wait three to six months and a new better machine will be available and the current one will drop in price. That is the name of the game in tech especially hardware. I am running on a dual 500 and made the desicion not to get a new machine till a dual 2gig came out. Do I know that an even faster machine will be available six months later, of course. Do I know that the dual 2gig will have a price drop three to six months after I buy it, of course. I just think that when you are dropping 3,000 on a machine it is tacky to ask a customer to pay $X two too four weeks later for the OS that is supposed to go with it. More than anything we are talking about time frame. If the OS was coming out 3 months later and had nothing to do with the particular machine you just dropped a wad of cash on fine, no big deal.

Mac users are die hard fans. Most of us in the past have defended them, bought them, and happily shelled out the extra money to own them. Our choice of course, but... How about saying to your customers thanks for buying our product and being so enthusiastic about it that you rushed out and got one right as they came of the line.

If they had led you to believe you were getting one thing and you got another it wouldn't be shady, it would be out and out disshonest.

aaronjf

3:28 pm on Aug 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Totally off the direction this thread has gone in; Apple will be releasing an opiton for the first Apple Branded wireless keyboard and mouse at the same time as Panther.

Article [appleinsider.com]

TheRealTerry

8:15 pm on Aug 1, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Wait to buy your machine then. The time frame is irrelevant. The release date is the release date is the release date. If your purchase of the machine is before the release date of the new OS, then the purchase of your machine is before the release date of the new OS. I might want to have the work day end on Thursday, but alas, it is on Friday for me. I cannot demand Friday's pay if I stop coming to work on Thursday, even though it was VERY close to the end of the week. You're just going to have to deal with it, or, like I said, wait to buy your G5.

aaronjf

4:21 pm on Aug 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have to wait now anyway. After I put my new equipment request in I realised I missed a bunch of stuff so I went back and added the rest. It jumped the bill from 4K to 12k so now I have to wait till November when I get my department's 2004 budget increase.

Speaking of which has anyone played with The Lacie Ether Disk [lacie.com] yet?

timster

1:10 pm on Aug 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Mark my words, G5's will ship with Panther from the get-go, because G5's won't be able to run under Jaguar.

- In the demonstrations of the G5 I've seen it's been running Panther.

- The G5 is a major upgrade in system architecture, so would require a major revision of an OS. Why would Apple spend all that time upgrading Jaguar when they're replacing it?

- If Panther boxed copies are released a little later than Panther in G5 boxes, that may well be because the installer has to be tested on lots more machines.

But don't let me interrupt the ranting and raving...

TheRealTerry

1:50 pm on Aug 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



From what they say they will release a 64 bit version of Jag first, but with the possible delays in G5 production, they very well may have Panther done in time for G5's to ship with it.

I for one would rather they work on getting the new OS completely cooked, rather than pushing it out to market not being fully tested and tweaked. They did that with iSync and it just hasn't worked completely since.

Okay, I can admit when I'm ranting, it just bugs me that every single time Apple releases a new product we hear the same old fussing about how Apple should give out freebies to the unfortunate ones who buy just before new version or models arrive. A phrase comes to mind: "Tough nooggies"

timster

2:34 pm on Aug 4, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



D'oh! You're right:

[apple.com...]
"The Power Mac G5 runs ... a version of Mac OS X Jaguar specially tuned for the PowerPC G5 processor"

You're also right about "tough noogies." As I have so exquisitely shown, one should do his research before one opens his mouth or wallet.