Forum Moderators: martinibuster
The page that links to me (according to the toolbar on Firefox) has a PR0.
When I go to the main page of the website, it has a PR6.
Did I get a link from a PR0 site or a PR6 site?
The page that linked to me was brand new and created by the owner with the specific intent of writing an article and linking back to me. (they did it all by themselves, I did not do a link request).
Thanks for helping clear up the confusion.
MadeWillis is right; the visible toolbar PR is not very reliable. So don't worry too much about PR. Instead, keep your primary focus on relevance. If you work at gaining links that make good sense to users, PR tends to look after itself.
thanks
There are, uh, less than forthcoming webmasters out there. If this was a link exchange then you might want to reconsider (based on futher investigation) how you want to "reciprocate".
Is it a good link?"
I would say YES, very much so- with the following qualifiers:
1) The 'tribute' page is relevant to the rest of site
2) The link from tribute is not NF (and the page header does not have meta-NF)
3) The 'tribute' page is not orphaned
4) Assuming (3), that the link is not NF (or meta-NF)
The best possible scenario is that:
1) Site is relevent to you (not just tribute page)
2) Tribute page has prominant, inline link on site's home page
3) Tribute is in internal Nav
4) Tribute is otherwise in-line referenced on other pages of site
5) Tribute page has an inline link to deep page on your site
6) Tribute page has additional link to your homepage (not necessarily inline)
7) Your site is only outbound link on page
And a bonus:
8) Your site is casually mentioned elsewhere on his site
[edited by: Shaddows at 12:16 pm (utc) on April 16, 2009]
Shadow: You mentioned "header NF". I had no idea you could NF the entire page just by meta NF in the header....
Do most bigger sites do this? A carpet-bomb NF for the entire page?