Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

pages with lots of links are not considered spammy by Google

the 100 link per page argument clarified

         

nealrodriguez

3:40 pm on Mar 18, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



pages with lots of links are not automatically considered spammy by Google.

cutts clearly points out that this is simply a “Design and content” suggestion by google; however, the links can be considered spammy if they are used for the following purposes:

Can pages with over 100 links be spammy? Sure, especially if those links are hidden or keyword-stuffed.

i still hear arguments on this online, so i thought i'd post a nice period.

ogletree

8:44 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Pages with more than 100 links are poor design. Even if google did not care it is a bad idea.

piatkow

9:16 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I built up a directory of local performers, venues and music stores on my music related site. It hit 200 and didn't rank in Google at all. I split it to three separate subject directories and those pages rank well in long tail searches and the directory home page comes in the top 3 in some major search arguements. Its also the most popular group of pages for Adsense (I should tune the channels around those pages a bit)

potentialgeek

9:38 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yeah, I think Google likes subdirectories for long tails. Divide and conquer!

Putting 100 links on a page may not violate a Google guideline, but it could actually get the page devalued based on Google's commitment to user experience. I suspect that factors into the algo.

The other thing is your internal links could be devalued if you put so many on one page.

p/g

Robert Charlton

3:03 am on Mar 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Parallel discussion here...

Google's "100 links per page" guideline
[webmasterworld.com...]

nealrodriguez

2:37 pm on Mar 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Putting 100 links on a page may not violate a Google guideline, but it could actually get the page devalued based on Google's commitment to user experience. I suspect that factors into the algo.

The other thing is your internal links could be devalued if you put so many on one page.

from the quack of the goose: [mattcutts.com...]

If you end up with hundreds of links on a page, Google might choose not to follow or to index all those links. At any rate, you’re dividing the PageRank of that page between hundreds of links, so each link is only going to pass along a minuscule amount of PageRank anyway.

my take is that it will also decrease the chance of a user clicking a link that one would want; same principle when you reduce the amount of options a user has for a good call to action.

Makaveli2007

4:21 pm on Mar 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Nice to read this. What do you guys think about this (a thread I started recently on a related topic, that nobody replied to unfortunately):

[webmasterworld.com...]

It makes me guess, that pages with "links", etc. in the title are not automatically considered spammy, either..what do you guys think?

[edited by: Makaveli2007 at 4:22 pm (utc) on Mar. 20, 2009]