Forum Moderators: martinibuster
bit of a basic one this...
understanding that the search engines like (amongst other things) relevant inbound links...
when / how does it decide if a site is a directory and not penalize it for lots of outbounds and little in bounds?
what gives directory's good rankings?
if i added a directory sub section to a site - would it penalize the site for having a growing number of outbounds v inbounds?
or is it just a balancing act?
thanks for any input on this..
as ever
keen to learn..
>> when / how does it decide if a site is a directory and not penalize it for lots of outbounds and little in bounds?
I never heard of any site being penalized for lots of outbounds - but I have heard of directories penalized for linking to multiple bad neighborhoods. Many 'unfussy' directories have zero value, and significant risk attached as a result. I don't think directories get any 'special' treatment at all (except maybe the big guys like ODP and Yahoo!).
>> what gives directory's good rankings?
Same as any other site; listings in directories of directories, links to quality sites, good content securing organic links, etc., etc.
>> if i added a directory sub section to a site - would it penalize the site for having a growing number of outbounds v inbounds?
Never heard of such a penalty - but I doubt you'd gain anything, if the 'directory' content did not match the rest of your site. let's face it, such a directory would only be there to game the SEs, it would have minimal visitor value (compared with a 'real' directory), so why would the SEs reward you? We know that 'links' pages are a red flag; a mini directory just for the SEs would look like a forest of red flags! Leave the directorying to the directories, and they'll leave your site specialty to you :)
>> or is it just a balancing act?
Not at all. Just build the site for your visitors before you even think about the SEs, and you'll not go far wrong; then continue to resist the temptation to do anything that is not in your visitors' interests. More logic than balance ;)
[edited by: Quadrille at 10:30 am (utc) on July 31, 2007]