Forum Moderators: martinibuster
My question is: Is it beneficial to swap reciprocal links with a directory? Most of the ones that I can find these days require it.
What kinds of things do you look for?
Thanks for any insight/comments...
"Diversity of traffic is a good thing. Therefore you should link and reciprocate links to your hearts content (and let the search engines find another way to map and rank knowledge.)" Webecclesiastes Chapter 2.02
With such a complete sideswipe of the value of reciprocation, how do you account for the good search results of our and cnvi's clients?
I know for a fact that most of our own clients do not use any other link building methods. That is their choice, not ours.
Oh - and this apples to both old domain and new domain clients, so the age of the links is not a factor.
With such a complete sideswipe of the value of reciprocation.
Oh, I'm not sideswiping reciprocation. What I am doing is providing my personal opinion on certain methods that are used for reciprocation. Many treat it as a commodity item which it is not. At least not for some of us. ;)
You know how I reciprocate? I look at statistics and if I see someone who linked to one of my properties, I follow the link, see what's up and if I like the resource, I'm going to provide a link back to them. And, I'm not going to tell them. Snicker, snicker, snicker. I'll even bury the link on a page within some real content too. Snicker, snicker, snicker. Surrounded by relevant text and totally on theme. Imagine that?
You can certainly do reciprocation any way you like. The "snicker" items you mentioned are your own perogatives. That's how you choose to spend your time.
If your statement "Many treat it as a commodity item which it is not. At least not for some of us. ;)" was some kind of slam, then it bounced off. Sorry.
My job is to get relevant links to client sites, and to get as many as possible. It has nothing to do with "commodity service". It has everything to do with being as thorough as possible. I have seen virtually no advantage whatsoever to leaving anything of value on the table in this business.
Two very different approaches. I refuse to apologize for mine or stand around and have it disparaged. I've been doing it very successfully for far too long now. As I said, it bounces off.
[edited by: DomainDrivers at 8:46 pm (utc) on April 24, 2007]
But lets face it, now everyone knows [assumes], more links = higher positions.
Which means everyone who is proactively seeking link exchanges, is just really trying to increase their rankings. Which is fine, as long as:
links are relevant/related
dont come from spammy "neighborhoods"
and you dont do more than about 50-100
If you dont do excessive link exchange then you should not have to worry about getting penalized. 50ish links should get you a PR5 or maybe a 6, which should be enough to compete with your major keyterms. The rest will come down to good optimization and content.
***************
links are relevant/related
dont come from spammy "neighborhoods"
and you dont do more than about 50-100
If you dont do excessive link exchange then you should not have to worry about getting penalized. 50ish links should get you a PR5 or maybe a 6, which should be enough to compete with your major keyterms. The rest will come down to good optimization and content.
*********************
whatson,
I was with you up to the 50-100 statement. I am directly aware of hundreds, (possibly thousands) of high ranking sites (#1 G positions) that have far more than 50-100 reciprocated links. Even thousands of them, in some cases. Ususally acquired over a long period of time.
Again, it is called thoroughness, not spam.
If a site does vet for
- links are relevant/related
- dont come from spammy "neighborhoods"
Then the chance of penalty is zilch...regardless of quantity.
You should be able to get at least 100 free links on sites with a Google PR of 6 or higher without paying for them and without giving reciprocal links.
Any quality SEO firm can show you how.
If it's not free, it's not for me.
And may I just point out that it is possible to garner a Google Page Rank 7, place #4 on a Google search out of 256,000,000 Results for a 2 word Keyphrase, with a Home page that does NOT contain the Keyphrase and a Web site which has only 20 inbound links. If your SEO expert doesn't know how this is possible, he is no expert.
No one really knows how google handles this stuff, plus its an automated algo, so even there, you can have un anticipated outcomes,
Ergo only link to sites that you trust an are usefull to your own uses,
Don't do too many cos once there are more than 20 links on a page, it does get kinda sill.
Also, before you link, do a quick check to see that the directory is listed in google, yahoo, and msn
it is possible to garner a Google Page Rank 7, place #4 on a Google search out of 256,000,000 Results for a 2 word Keyphrase, with a Home page that does NOT contain the Keyphrase and a Web site which has only 20 inbound links