Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Link Checkers

Are they of value or waste of time?

         

The_Banker

3:40 pm on Apr 23, 2006 (gmt 0)



I need a really good way of checking number of links to websites. Found a couple but am unsure about how accurate they are.

Trouble is the one I use seems to raise and lower the amount of links I have to my sites, so I no longer trust it, but the tool in question seems to be an authority for this type of service. Are there any trustworthy backlink checkers?

A point in the right direction would be appreciated.

oceandragon

6:13 pm on Apr 23, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



You can use <snip> to check backlink or google with keyword "yourdomain".

[edited by: trillianjedi at 7:27 pm (utc) on April 23, 2006]
[edit reason] No tool drops please - as per TOS [/edit]

trillianjedi

7:27 pm on Apr 23, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The only true way of doing this accurately is to crawl the web. In the absence of that overhead, I find Yahoo! to be quite reasonable....

TJ

The_Banker

8:40 pm on Apr 23, 2006 (gmt 0)



ye, but that really cuts into time - so it's not an option. Under 100 links, and it might be doable, but realistically who's got the time to keep monitoring backlinks.

If anyone has the time to do this then I'd wonder about how bad business is. Usually I have better things to do than to check who's linking and who isn't.

What if you have 6'000 links to check - you going to keep going through Yahoo and check every single one - every month?

sugarrae

11:19 pm on Apr 23, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>>What if you have 6'000 links to check - you going to keep going through Yahoo and check every single one - every month?

Most people with more than a basic need would hire their programmer to build them something, IMHO.

The_Banker

12:14 am on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)



I assume you mean either some kind of robot to fetch back the results of whoever still links to your site or a viral tool that's connected to an internal database that keeps track of those links. But the 'results' still have to be sifted through by a human, so the endless rechecking hasn't really disappeared.

I actually have such a system in place right now, and it records everything it's programmed to, except it still has to be reviewed by me on a constant basis. So the work is still around.

martinibuster

4:04 am on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Need a reliable Link checker
How do I count my links?

[webmasterworld.com...]

trillianjedi

9:06 am on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



whoever still links to your site

If you're only checking your own site it's easy - logfile.

TJ

The_Banker

10:22 am on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)



Sorry, what do you mean by log file? List of urls who link to you?

trillianjedi

10:29 am on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



No, your webserver can be configured to generate a logfile of visitors which can include referrer data.

There is a dedicated forum on this over here:-

[webmasterworld.com...]

TJ

The_Banker

10:30 am on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)



Thanks

sugarrae

1:57 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>>But the 'results' still have to be sifted through by a human

Not if you make the program detailed enough. You can have it cross check with the last run and create one file of only "new" links or whatever other properties you specify. It boils down to how intuitive you are when designing the program - as far as what your specific needs are when checking backlinks. If you want it to show you a listing of only new results, or only show one result when there are multiple results from the same domain, etc you just need to program it to do so.

The_Banker

2:52 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)



It doesn't matter what the program cross-checks or lists , the results that it records still have to be read by the human eye. You cannot avoid the painstaking effort of checking every link by 'clever' web design. Web design can record stuff, but those results still need monitoring manually.

Physical checking will always be required - computers can't accomplish that as well as us humans, as 'seeing' with one's own eyes is more satisfying and accurate than a computer generated result.

Computers chuck up information - yes, but it can't monitor to see if every webmaster is still linking to you.

Not automatically it can't as it requires human intervention to manually check each link.

trillianjedi

3:54 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



but it can't monitor to see if every webmaster is still linking to you.

Yes it can - just parse your logfile and check each one off from a database...

TJ

The_Banker

4:20 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)



"check each one off from a database" - what do you mean by that - in lamens terms please.

trillianjedi

4:28 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Laymens terms

Check to see that every domain in your "should be linking to me" database is in the logfile as a referrer.

The_Banker

4:58 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)



Well, I still have to do this manually.

trillianjedi

6:40 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



No you don't.

Talk to a coder - 30 minute job to build a script or app that automates it.

TJ

The_Banker

7:09 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)



Thanks, but as I said earlier, I've already done this so I know the score.

Thanks anyway

sugarrae

7:51 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>>I need a really good way of checking number of links to websites

Well, if you think you've already done this and think it is impossible and think that a programmer can't custom build you something then there is no point to this thread. If you believe it is undoable with custom programming, you're certainly not going to find a free or "available to the public for a charge" one on the net. Because, if a programmer is "incapable" of coding it (whatever it is you want) - then it can't exist.

martinibuster

7:58 pm on Apr 24, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Rae, that pretty much sums it up. I guess this discussion is over.