Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Is is proper to offer incentives to other sites to link to one's own site.Any problems with this?
Not sure what you mean by "proper," or for that matter what you mean by "incentives." If you're talking about cash incentives, Google doesn't like it. It's a kind of manipulation that they feel is definitely crossing a line. Neverthless, you might consider some directory submission fees to be incentives. It can get complicated.
Please, I don't want to get into an "all SEO is manipulation" kind of discussion.
Couple of Tips:
-Include a request in all outgoing e-mails, paid receipts, letters and shipments asking for a link. Offer them a discount or something free with their next order. Too often people disregard their current customers. They are your best promoters. If your customers are happy they will be more than happy to help you grow your business. Everyone wants to be a part of something successful.
-Offer a gift certificate to your site to anyone who links to you (within your linking guidelines of course). If you offer a $100 gift certificate and your cost of goods is 30% it is only costing you $30.
-If you work in the software industry or something that can be inexpensively duplicated offer the product for free for a link/recommendation.
-Create a contest from user submissions (photos, jokes, cartoons, stories, tips, etc). Offer prizes. Have visitors vote for the winner. Offer people who enter a promotional banner (or standard text link) to put on their website to encourage their users to vote for their entry. That way you get some links and new visitors.
-Cash always works. Downside is you are paying monthly for years.
Best of Luck!
-Offer a gift certificate to your site to anyone who links to you (within your linking guidelines of course). If you offer a $100 gift certificate and your cost of goods is 30% it is only costing you $30.
This is where I thought this discussion would be going, and it is specifically the technique I was cautioned against by Matt Cutts. "Crossing a line" was Matt's language.
I don't want to defend Google's position or to debate it... I'm just reporting what was said.