Forum Moderators: martinibuster
Unless they've been sussed for selling PR in which case you could go to a PR0.
In my experience, Google tend to PR0 the linkor page, not the linkee page (although I have seen it happen, it's really quite rare - or possibly explained by coincidental penalty - I never really got to the bottom of it).
TJ
If third parties could harm you then there is no guarantee they can't harm you now. There's no guarantee they can't harm you badly just by linking to you (eg: several sitewides with a PPCasino anchor).
rookie, if you really want to build PR I'd recommend a larger number of links from lower PR pages. Stay under the radar... take PR6 and below.
other sites could screw you... even assuming the hijack.....was a "bug"...
That's the point though, it was due to a bug/flaw, not a deliberate measure.
There no guarantee they can't harm you badly just by linking to you
That would be a deliberate measure by Google, or a side-effect of a deliberate measure.
I'm not disagreeing with you in principle - I would just say it perhaps a little differently like:-
"There's a possibility that an unforseen side-effect or bug in google will mean that another site can have a detrimental effect on your site, contrary to googles aims or reassurance. We've seen it happen before with 302 redirects."
I wouldn't put it stronger than that, but I accept it probably needs to be said.
I did a lot of analysis last year on three sites I saw getting nuked that had purchased PR/links (from obvious sellers - i.e. sales pitch not worded as "advertising" but as SEO) to see if I could work out a correlation between the fact that they bought links, and their getting nuked. I couldn't conclude that correlation existed, as there were other influencing factors which could have given rise to a manual penalty.
I accept it's always good advice to anticipate that google can have the odd bug here and there which might cause you problems.
But I would also say that it's more likely that a thorough and manual investigation of a site selling PR would result also in a manual/human examination of the linkee (buyer) pages.
That is I suspect the root of what I saw last year, with these three sites being nuked.
The purchased links just created a flag trail for google quality control employees (in my opinion and speculation).
Caveat emptor.
Sorry to drag this thread OT ;-). We might be better off carrying on elsewhere if you want to OddSod. It's interesting conjecture!
<added>Just saw you added this:-
rookie, if you really want to build PR I'd recommend a larger number of links from lower PR pages. Stay under the radar... take PR6 and below.
Yes, I totally agree.
</added>
TJ