Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

3-way linking

is it bad/harmful?

         

Purva

2:18 am on Jan 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I get a lot of 3 way linking requests. should i accept them? If a wabmaster with 10 websites (5 of them PR-4 or PR5 and remaining five PR0)offers to place my links on 5 sites with PR and requests me to place a link of her 5 sites without PR on my site, is this a good arrangement to say yes to?
I need one more clarification: A website with PR6 gives me a link on a page with PR0 and another site with PR4, places my link on a page with PR3. what is better? Should website rank be considered while finally okaying/considering a link exchange arrangment or PR of the link page we will be placed on?

Terabytes

2:31 am on Jan 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Since publicly viewable PR has NOT been updated in "forever"...don't place so much emphasis on it....are the inbound link pages on target with your site "having the same general topic"?

Example: your site is about widgets, a link from "Bob's shoeshine parlor and bait shop" will gain you nothing because it's off topic...likewise your outbound link to "Bob" will also be off topic and do no good...except for giving them an additional inbound link...thats all...

Don't waste your time if it's off target...put your effort into your own page content...making your site stand on it's own...I have very few inbounds however I rank #1 for my chosen keyword(s) and have for over a year....content is king!...

The PR you are seeing is about 7'ish months old...and may not be the current ranking of those pages...just think about it...if the site that is linking to you is nothing more than a link farm...again...you're wasting your time...

martinibuster

3:29 am on Jan 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>>>The PR you are seeing is about 7'ish months old...

There's some truth to that, but not totally. It's not up to date, maybe three months, or maybe one month. It's not 100%

In either case, gtbpr is only a partial indicator of the real PR.

moishe

4:47 am on Jan 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Am I missing something? Did we not just see a toolbar update right on quarterly schedule, right at the first of the year?

Purva

5:47 am on Jan 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thankyou very much all of you. What I have understod from the replies is that, i should make sure my links on any website should be on a similarly themed page as my main theme, for me to get an advantage. If some site is about widgets with a link page "Dance-steps and. My site's theme is dance steps and i have a link category and a link page with all widgets links. then this is a good deal. sorry if i sound too micro but i'd rather get my fudas cleared. thank all of you once again.

martinibuster

6:32 am on Jan 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>>>Am I missing something?

Maybe. I don't know what you know.

There is a publicly viewable PR and there is an internally knowable (at Google) PR. It has also been stated by Google engineers that there are many variables at play and that the toolbar green is not an accurate measurement:

This bit about the toolbar is from an interview with a Google Search engineer [e-marketing-news.co.uk] last December 2003:

...it's not very precise. We have a lot more precision available to us than we represent in a ten step scale or whatever it is on the PageRank tool... And we're not naive enough to think that we can condense every indicator about a page into a number from one to ten. We certainly can't do that.

Although the toolbar has recently been updated on a quarterly basis, it's not known whether this is a recent snapshot, an aggregate snapshot over the last three months, a snapshot from somewhere in between, or from a point three months ago. But it may be reasonable to assume that it's a fairly recent snapshot judging from what people have noted here at WebmasterWorld. But that's not 100%.

Should website rank be considered? Hmm. One thing you really should be paying attention to if you are exchanging links is how relevant that page is to you. That's just my opinion, so feel free to disagree.

larryhatch

7:17 am on Jan 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hello Martinibuster:

The Google engineer is right that multiple factors figure into the evaluation of a page.
But at the end, G has to make a simple one-dimensional determination:

Does some page pppp rank above or below page qqqq?
They can't display them on top of one another.

There must be some single number, possibly decimal, that determines the order pages are
displayed in for given keyword(s).

I wish I could Google up my real number from time to time. - Larry