Forum Moderators: martinibuster
From that point of view, reciprocal links are as much a threat as bought ones, but generate much less controversy.
Both were around before Google, so let's assume their existence was factored into the algo.
Rather than trying to weed out by type, it would make more sense for Google to treat all links equally and include them all in their "links scheme designed to improve PR or ranking" test.
Which is where bought or reciprocal links could be undone, not for the type of link in a linkage pattern, more from the perceived purpose of it...
FWIW, I had a competitor try to do this to me and it didn't work. He used cloked pages stuffed with links to me. From all indications Google simply disregarded them.
(By the way, maggot-boy is now out of business. Guess he focused on the wrong thing, huh?)
FWIW, I had a competitor try to do this to me and it didn't work. He used cloked pages stuffed with links to me. From all indications Google simply disregarded them.(By the way, maggot-boy is now out of business. Guess he focused on the wrong thing, huh?)
lol, 'maggot-boy', i like it.
And thanks for the intelligence - I am glad to hear a real world example.