Forum Moderators: martinibuster

Message Too Old, No Replies

Locating relevant high PR sites

Is there an easy way to screen only sites with high PR for exchanges?

         

HeyJim

12:55 am on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



If I'm being a little exclusive in only wanting to exchange links with relevant sites that have a minimum PR, I have to visit, oh, maybe a dozen sites before I find a PR5 site in my area of interest.

Is there a more time efficient way of doing this then the SERP's so that I'm visiting ONLY relevant sites with a home page PR of 5 (for example)?
If I search on widgets + "exchange links" I get a wide variety of PR. Very time consuming to visit unqualified (PR too low) sites looking for the right mix. Any suggestions?

netcommr

1:16 am on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



currently any site ranking on PR, aside from Google themselves, is against Google's terms of service.

It has happened that a site and any site associated with a program like this has lost PR because of it.

be careful if you find one...

currently, you have to keep doin it the hard way... ah ya appreciate the results so much better anyway.

PROsha

7:17 am on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



You may try to browse Google Directory that allows "Viewing in Google PageRank order".

mil2k

7:39 am on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes Google directory is your Best bet. Browse through the categories related to yours and you would find them. :) I have tried this method and it's also time consuming. Hope it works for you though.

dirkz

10:08 am on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



But if you do a google search as you said you will get relevant sites first ...
Maybe you should just search for widgets and then test the first sites for PR and then email them for link exchange.
This way you get relevant sites for your keywords, and not relevant sites for "exchange links". This is what I do in my area. I can't say it works well, because I only exchange links with real quality sites and this has nothing to do with PR. It's only now and then I find a jewel to link to ...

PROsha

10:50 am on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi Dirkz,

Why would you want to exchange links with sites, which are ranked well “for your keywords”? Aren’t they your direct competitors? And why do you think that they are willing to share their traffic with you?

I found that through the Google Directory you can target industries, which are relatively close (but not in direct competition) to yours and are presented with the higher PR sites at the top of the list.

I also would like to comment on your “I only exchange links with real quality sites” statement.

First, some of our fellow colleagues probably just started their business (how many rejections have you received when you started just because of PR0). Unless the site is penalised, purely designed or has bad content, I’d give it a go and see what’ll happen with its performance in the foreseeable future.

Second, PR is not the only issue. Quite often sites with lower PR can generate much more targeted traffic to your site, depending on the nature of your business and the industry.

Good linking.

PROsha

dirkz

11:22 am on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



PROsha, yes I also link to direct competitors, IMHO there's no reason not to. If they have the better product or info or whatever in my visitor's eye, then they would find it anyway. Of course most competitors don't see this the way I do, so most don't link back, but there are a few who do and it's win-win.

By quality sites I meant exactly that, no PR involved. I will also gladly link to a PR0 if the content is high quality for my visitors.

bcc1234

11:52 am on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Thank God for people like you.
When they email me, I just reply back with my link instructions and never bother to do anything else :)

dirkz

12:13 pm on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



bcc1234, after a while of course the link will be removed if not reciprocated :)
But I have in fact links on my page that are ranked for the competitor's name before the competitor's site :)
So all the traffic passes my site from visitors that forgot to bookmark his site, and now they are searching for his domain name and are sent to me.
I wait a couple of days, then I will email him again for a reciprocal, and if not, it's bad luck for him.

mil2k

1:00 pm on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



First, some of our fellow colleagues probably just started their business (how many rejections have you received when you started just because of PR0). Unless the site is penalised, purely designed or has bad content, I’d give it a go and see what’ll happen with its performance in the foreseeable future.

Bravo! :) we need more people like you. Not many people understand this. And this is the ultimate long term strategy you can think of. When people say it's difficult to get links from PR 4 pages they forget that most of the links on that PR 4 page might have been put up when it was a PR 0 ;). And good sites always bring in their share of traffic.Especially if it is a special niche segment site you have.

killroy

1:07 pm on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



All that aside, I've found searching for "inurl:links pagerank" on google brings me pages that have explicit linking instructions and usually PR limits themselves (usually an indication that their page is also high PR).

SN

HeyJim

1:26 pm on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks to everyone for your replies.
In light of some of the responses I guess I should expand on my initial question by adding that I do exchange links with sites with low, or even no, PageRank.
PR is not the big thing for me when it comes to exchanging links.
However there are phases I go through (such as when Google drops my site from a 6 to a 4) when I say, "Hmmm. Better offset a few of those low PR sites with a few stronger ones".

davewray

5:42 pm on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What a bunch of bs. Frankly I'm sick of cocky site owners who will add your link to their site then send you an email "informing" you that your link is now on there site. 3 days later they email back saying something like, "I linked to your site a few days ago, but noticed that you have not linked back. If you're not interested in linking, please let me know and I will remove your link". Why the hell did you add my link in the first place? Anyways, three days later this same person informs you that they have removed your link because you do not reciprocate. Of course I'm not going to link to your freakin LINK farm. Please don't waste my time by sending these stupid, annoying emails. If you want to link to me because you think I offer good content, great! If you have good content I'll likely link back. However, if you are just linking to me so that you can "suck" me into linking to your LINK farm to pass on PR, then forget about it punk ;)

*End of rant*

Dave.

sean

7:59 pm on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



davewray,

I can certainly understand how you feel (and much depends on the quality of the sites in question) but keep in mind not every webmaster has your implied level of luxury.

Should they sit around and wait for links, worried about upsetting a sensitive webmaster, and risk failure?

Or should they request links, taking into account the human nature of most webmasters, and guarantee success?

Having a mix of old and new sites, I can see how new webmasters could complain about "lazy" established webmasters on their high horses who have stopped adding new links.

But finger pointing and ranting misses the point. You see a lot of these techniques because they are necessary and they work. And if human nature changes overnight, you will no doubt see a shift in techniques.

PROsha

10:30 pm on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dave,

No worries mate. Just relax.

If you think that everyone requesting a link is a link farmer, you most likely had some bad experience. We are not all like that. Some of us are good guys trying hard to build our link popularity. And, believe it or not, some of us have great sites.

I see no problems in putting a link to my site prior I request a reciprocal link. I think it’s ethical. And I have no problem to send a polite reminder a couple of weeks later. I expect that I deal with normal people who would act adequately. After all, we all in the same boat and we all appreciate the value of incoming links. I should say “good quality, relevant, etc. links”.

However, there are folks who don’t understand that quality is more important than quantity and there are some who just run link farms. You never know till you visit their sites.

With newbies, it’s simple. Just send them e-mail with the link to a good article or a web site about linking popularity. They will very much appreciate it.

For link farmers I have very straightforward linking policy saying that if the web site requesting a reciprocal link doesn’t match all the criteria, the enquiry will be ignored. As simple as that.

I mentioned in my previous post, that we all had started once upon a time and without great support from more experienced people our life could be much harder. This forum is just about that.

So let’s exchange links.

PROsha.

davewray

10:48 pm on Sep 2, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I realize that many of you are newbies, I was just one myself not too long ago! I also realize that that's how business is done. I'm sure most of you send polite emails to your prospective link partners. What I hate are those snobby, automated emails that basically say, "You didn't link back to me, so #%$^ you, your link is gone.", as though I was obligated link to them. Like I said in my previous post, if I get such an email and visit their site...and like their site/content, I will in all liklihood link back. I haven't become a lazy, old site owner yet ;)

Dave.

netcommr

9:12 am on Sep 3, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Let me post just a little suggestion to those finding it really hard to get people to respond to link requests.

When you get one, do you give them any credit for knowing anything? ususally not!

then why do you not give them references to what you are intending?

I know this sounds strange, but give them a link in your email to the best post on this site for why you want to link to them, or from any other site with credibility. YOU DON'T HAVE CREDIBILITY ON YOUR OWN. You MUST have credibility to get links from some sites. They don't know you or know what you know. Give them some credible resources to look at explaining what you want to accomplish. This gives the other person at least some idea you know what your talking about. Forget trying to sell them on it, they have made a descition of 'no' regardless of what you say unless you can give them ANY valid resource outside of yourself.

quit banging your head against the wall, get the door open before you charge ahead...!