Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Color Schemes,

Websafe, Named, etc.

         

sderenzi

3:42 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)



I was just wondering whom out there uses Websafe colors as oppose to ones that are named or just and #. I am trying to make everything on my site Websafe and that does to a point limit the Color Scheme. So what do you all think?

pmkpmk

3:58 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



In my recent site-redesign I stopped doing everything websafe except for the key design- and navigation elements. From my point of view, the web-safe-colors are not necessary anymore.

Other opinions?

moltar

4:05 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I don't think websafe colors ever mattered that much. Nothing bad will happen if use a color that is not "websafe." Old browsers will just substitute that color for a similar one.

TGecho

4:05 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I don't go out of my way to use websafe. As long as people with less than thousands of colors can use my sites without trouble, I'm happy. However I still tend to use nice "round" colors (i.e. colors that can be written with three numbers: #333 = #333333, #123 = #112233)

pmkpmk

4:07 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



In my current redesign I used the complementary color of my companies well-established logo color. Thus paired with a neutral gray works great.

#0099ff
#ff9900
#808080

moltar

4:11 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



This are some more extensive stats from TheCounter:


(32bit) - 213399987 - (59%)
65K (16bit) - 113094251 - (31%)
16M (24bit) - 24407931 - (6%)
256 (8bit) - 5547335 - (1%)
Unknown - 509759 - (0%)
16 (4bit) - 61038 - (0%)

Eric_Jarvis

5:24 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



what you get from using the "web safe" is no "dithering" (creating a colour by alternating pixels of other colours) on low resolution dsiplsys...so it was never really all that important unless you had a large area of the colour...I still tend to use the "web safe" colours for large areas if I think it's particularly likely to be viewed by a lot of low res systems...but by and large I'm not sure it's worth being hung up on these days

I always use #****xxx to denote the colours...it seems to be the most consistently reliable way to do it

sderenzi

6:39 pm on Mar 26, 2004 (gmt 0)



It seems my attempt to go Websafe failed anyway. I found myself digging through for colors I felt I wanted rather than ones that were only Websafe. Ah well thanks for the input!