Forum Moderators: open
Please see this newest IE bug and the spoof example [secunia.com], very scary!
Basically it uses the IE engine to run HTML as an application, allowing cross frame scripting, file access, etc. without warnings. Meant for intranet access, could be deadly for a virus to get through.
Mmm.. IE Bugs.. another good reason to use Opera :)
(or Netscape or Mozilla or anything else really!)
If 95% of computers connected to the internet would be using Opera, that post would read:
Mmm.. Opera Bugs.. another good reason to use IE :)
(or Netscape or Mozilla or anything else really!)
NOt to say people shouldn't switch to another browser. The more competition, the better for the end user.
If 95% of computers connected to the internet would be using Opera, that post would read...
It's true that the high concentration of the world's resources in IE-Outlook-Windows makes it an ideal target. But the tight integration of email/browser/OS makes for all kinds of extra trouble that you don't get into when you're using stand alone applications.
If 95% of computers connected to the internet would be using Opera, that post would read...
Absolutely, Microsoft is a big target because loads of people dislike them and everyone uses them. But as tedster points out, 'normal' browsers don't get to fiddle with the OS like IE does so there is less exposure to bugs like this.
Plus if 95% of people used Opera they would also be saying...
etc etc ;)
Well, if I were to click ona PDF link and got the download windows instead of an in-browser PDF I'd be highly suspicious right away.
True, but we are the 10% of the general computing using public that's left-handed (oh wait, I'm left-handed! Sorry, just trying to be funny. :)) The rest of the public might think that a pdf or anything else should be downloaded, not knowing that browsers can support it.
Do I make any sense? My train of thought de-railed. :o
Mac
What this exploit does is trick the user into downloading an executable.
This could happen with any browser - provided the "hacker" finds a way (or exploit) to trick the user into doing this.
(Btw, the article -linked in the first post- does not mention .hta files.
As far as I can see, this has nothing to do with .hta files specifically.)
True, but we are the 10% of the general computing using public that's left-handed (oh wait, I'm left-handed! Sorry, just trying to be funny. ) The rest of the public might think that a pdf or anything else should be downloaded, not knowing that browsers can support it.
Just like the rest of the public thinks they have to (double)click every link or file from every email from every-one. ;-)