Forum Moderators: open
Reviews? Opinions? Suggestions? Comparisons? (with LaTex? others?)
I'm compiling a large number of research and subject bibliographies for my content heavy website and don't want to miss the chance of getting in on the ground level for effective mark up of information.... naturally enough, I'd like my hard work to survive for years to come.
Would ideally like to code the info in an XML language, then use the files as a database for future presentation / transformation....
Anyone?
I'd really appreciate any advice at all on this matter. Thanks in advance...
My idea was to write the main content in Simplified Docbook, then use XSLT to transform it into an output format, which would probably be XHTML 1.1. The beauty is that if I maintain some consistency in the XML file format, I can add new XSLT files to support other output formats as needed.
I've done some experiments transforming between Simpified Docbook and XHTML with good results. I've found that SD allows me to describe all the content and meta-data that I also want in the output. Normal Docbook is a huge beast, I think I'll stick with SD for now. It should be possible to transform SD into normal Docbook should I ever feel the need to go that route.
I used AxKit 1.0 and Apache 1.3.27 as the framework, but I'd prefer to use Apache 2.0, which AxKit doesn't work with.. I've thought about writing my own simple Apache 2.0 handler to do it in the mean-time, at least until AxKit 2.0 is ready. (I don't know what their status is on AxKit 2.0. It seems to have been talked about, but I haven't seen any real progress lately)
Again, I haven't done any real-world tests using this framework, mostly just playing around with a handful of pages. If you do go this route I'd love to hear how it works our for you.