Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.227.110.209

Forum Moderators: incrediBILL

Message Too Old, No Replies

urls without .html or .htm pages on the end

     

caffinated

5:39 am on Nov 27, 2010 (gmt 0)



When I build web pages, I use the popular historical process of calling the home page index.htm and lets say I have products.htm and services.htm on the site too.

So within index.htm I have links that look like:
<a href="http://website.com/products.htm">products</a>

Recently I have noticed some developers putting their pages in separate folders each with an index.htm, so their links to the same kind of content as above would like like:

<a href="http://website.com/products/">products</a>

Can anyone explain the reasons/benefits of the latter?

cmnetworx

5:48 am on Nov 27, 2010 (gmt 0)



If you ever change your programming language, from html to php, asp, etc you can just place the appropriate index.(php|asp|?) file under that folder and delete the index.htm as opposed to making an .htaccess file to rewrite the request.

better than having all your links go to
domain.com/page2.html when your new page is
domain.com/page3.php

much easier to just go to
domain.com/page2

Either way .com/page2.html or domain.com/page2 both are easy to rewrite with an .htaccess file when it really boils down to it..

personally I like placing the documents in independent folders and named index.php because I hate seeing extensions..

caffinated

7:20 am on Nov 27, 2010 (gmt 0)



Thanks cmnetworx. I ran a test and this process do work in html too.

You've explained re-write reasons, fair enough, but it is the last sentence there that I'm interested in. Is it simply a matter of visual preference or are there seo implications too perhaps relating to canonical url best practices?

cmnetworx

7:43 am on Nov 27, 2010 (gmt 0)



To me its just visual, As far as I know there are no seo downsides to url's with extensions (index.html).

it is easier to tell a user to go to
www.website.com/blah
than website.com/blah.html, or .shtml, etc.

but then again 80% of the time you tell a user to enter the url in their address bar they end up googling it anyways.. This wouldn't suck so bad if they didn't get confused by sponsored links..

milosevic

10:25 am on Nov 30, 2010 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



Yes, it looks better, I think for me it's probably a small factor in choosing what search engine result to click on.

cmnetworx

4:55 pm on Nov 30, 2010 (gmt 0)



when I am going down through the list of search results on google or something I don't care either way if it has a file extension or not.. It's just on my domains. I think its because typing .htm takes so much more effort, lol.. Actually in my scenario I try to not make it completely obvious that I am using php this way some noob won't try to mess with my pages/forms or sql injections.. because if they think I am running something else (anything else) at least their attempts would be a waste of time..

milosevic

9:16 am on Dec 1, 2010 (gmt 0)

5+ Year Member



Usually I wouldn't pay any attention to it, but results with a filetype URL are in my experience more likely to be spam with certain areas of queries.
 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month