Forum Moderators: open
I don't really care that they want me to remove the no-follow attribute, however for the sake of shutting them up I'd like to make it seem as though I've removed it without actually having removed it.
Does anyone know of a way of hiding the no-follow attribute in a link so that the link is not followed by spiders but the rel="no-follow" is not visible to uses examining the code?
Thanks in advance for any advice
In addition, no, you could not hide the no-follow. If you tried to add it programmatically with JavaScript, then the spiders would not see it. In theory, you might be able to do some server side sniffing to try and determine if the visitor is a spider or a human and modify the links server side, but that can get you blacklisted with search engines.
The easiest way is through user-agent sniffing. Looking for the user agents of the engines and, when found, serving the nofollow.
The above being said, I'm with Fotiman...it's your blog, they have no right to tell you how to run it.
I don't really care that they want me to remove the no-follow attribute, however for the sake of shutting them up I'd like to make it seem as though I've removed it without actually having removed it.
Handle it how you choose, but consider doing so honestly; perhaps clear policies that you actually follow and not just use as window dressing, established standards of business and personal conduct.....
Handle it how you choose, but consider doing so honestly; perhaps clear policies that you actually follow and not just use as window dressing, established standards of business and personal conduct.....
Visitors to my website who are their to build links via my articles are deceitful in the nature of their communication. Sometimes the best way to beat a liar is to let them think their lies have been believed.
"I have to pay for my inbound links and advertising. So should you. If you'd like to link to your site, I'll be happy to work out a financial arrangement with you."
People are trained to think the Internet=free ride. Never let the fear of losing customers/contacts/members govern decisions like this. It may hurt a little, but the users that respect you will recognize it as . . . quality control.
</opinion>
Anybody disagreeing so much as to voice it out on your site: good riddance, they were in it for self promotional reasons.
Smart spammers would not bother to post their crap when you have rel="nofollow" all over the user contribute content parts, but unfortunately many aren't that smart.