Forum Moderators: open
IE7 - 33%
IE6 - 53%
FF2 - 5%
FF1.5 - 4%
Safari - 2%
This from a big UK govt sector site.
IE7 - 37.5%
IE6 - 44.6%
FF2 - 5.6%
FF1.5 - 4.3%
Safari - 4.2%
Mozilla - 0.8%
Opera - 0.4%
On my regular sites:
Win: 85%
Mac: 12%
Other: 3%
IE: 83%
FF: 10%
Other: 7%
On my home site, which caters to geeks:
Same OS breakdown, but check this out:
IE: 51%
FF: 42%
Other: 7%
IE7: 38.3%
IE6: 45.5%
IE5.x (Mac): 0.2%
Total Internet Exploder: 84%
FF2: 3.7%
FF1.5: 6%
FF1.0: 1%
Total Firefox: 10.7%
Safari: 2%
Mozilla: 1.3%
Opera: 0.7%
Total others: 4%
Operating systems:
Windows: 92.8%
Linux: 3.8%
Mac: 2.7%
MSIE 8780 66.3 %
Msie 7.0 13.1 %
Msie 6.0 52.4 %FIREFOX 1469 11 %
Firefox 2.0.0.1 6.4 %
Firefox 1.5.0.9 3 %NETSCAPE 18 0.1 %
Others 2970 22.4 %
Opera 8.4 %
Unknown 8 %
Safari 4.9 %
Konqueror 0.4 %
Mozilla 0.3 %
Nokia 23.7 %
MSIE 21.4 %
SonyEricsson 15.4 %
Motorola 12.0 %
Firefox 7.8 %
Samsung 5.6 %
LG 2.1 %
Sage RSS 2 %
Opera 1.7 %
Others 8.1 %
Certainly not typical but I had to post it
Internet Explorer:
6: 32%
7: 35.5%
Firefox:
1.5: 10%
2.x: 5.5%
Netscape:
4.7: 6% (yuck, I hadn't noticed this before!)
IE7: 23.8%
IE6: 56.2%
FF2: 5.6%
FF1.5: 4.0%
Safari: 2.0%
by Family:
All IE: 82.4%
All FF: 10.8%
All NS: 0.4%
Just looking at the stats, and thought I might squeeze a question in, but obviously not quite as important as I felt iyt might be judging by the preponderence of IE users.
Pages on my site that have vaildated with HTML 4.01 Transitional come up fine in IE - I'm using 6.
I am not using CCS at this point.
In FF the color information is missing in the fonts and as background in cells.
The sizing is also more exagerated vertically, distance between <tr>s, <p>s, <h1>s, etc.
Before I brought the pages up to spec I didn't have the problem.
A suggestion was made to me that I might include a note on the page saying that it has been optimized for viewing on IE. I am considering doing that to direct people to view the site with IE.
