Forum Moderators: open
I got some error massage from my validator;
1. Comment: The lite edition missed 2 warnings that the standard or professional edition would have found.
2. Comment: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 messages, 2 comments.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<body><h4>Cell that spans two rows:</h4>
<table border="1">
<tr>
<th>First Name:</th>
<td>Bill Gates</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2">Telephone:</th>
<td>555 77 854</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>555 77 855</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
1. Comment: The lite edition missed 2 warnings that the standard or professional edition would have found.
2. Comment: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 messages, 2 comments.
This sounds less like an error message and more like a sales pitch. If this "lite" validator is so limited that it won't even warn about a missing
title element, then it is not worth using at all. Rather than pay out for a validator tool, why not use the free W3C one:
[validator.w3.org...]
There is also the free web developer extension for Firefox which works perfectly too.
So far, it has worked out fine for me.
However, as someone suggested, use Firefox [mozilla.com] with the absolutely invaluable Web Developer [chrispederick.com] add-on. It gives you so many useful tools that I don't even know where to start. I have also added tools to it for colorblind simulation [colorlab.wickline.org], as well as for validators like Hermish [hermish.com] tools.
These are all free tools that I believe are directly useful to Web developers.
[edited by: tedster at 10:03 pm (utc) on Jan. 4, 2007]
the website for the Hermish does not offer to download.
Yeah, but he has some very useful tools in there, like a browser compatibility tester [hermish.com].
Validome [validome.org] is a multi-protocol validator that allows upload. I like it because I can validate WML (WAP) against it.
Try also [validator.w3.org...]