Forum Moderators: open
One that does not affect search engines spyders from reading the content?
I saw this: <snip> it seems to be the best I tried to hack one of their pages and simply couldnt...
I would love to get more suggestions since this script is kind of expensive..
[edited by: encyclo at 4:05 am (utc) on Jan. 10, 2006]
[edit reason] specifics removed, see below [/edit]
Most attempts to obfuscate web pages fail as soon as the user uses a different browser, and anyone with the technical knowledge to copy a site will have the technical knowledge to get around the protection.
Is there any reason why you need this? I'd suggest you don't bother as I can't see how it's going to stop anyone. The web by it's very nature is technically open.
The example script you mentioned is pure snake-oil - every single one of its "options" can be bypassed by even the least technical user (in fact there are several sites which explain the process in detail). That is if the script works at all - many of the enabled features don't work as advertized unless you are using a particular configuration of IE and Windows.
You have to ask yourself what you are trying to "protect": the source code of a page is of little value as it is easy to recreate a page design. The content (wording) can be copied with a simple copy/paste or even by retyping it manually. Despite the grossly exagerated claims of "protection" or "encryption" scripts, if you put something on the web it can be copied. True value lies in the back-end processing (customer databases for example) and those are not readily accessible anyway.
A content thief in Italy copied an important resource from my site in December 2003. Initially, I was concerned, but within three months his version didn't even make sense any more - given industry developments.
I decided eventually not to worry about his stupid attempt to steal content.