Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.198.15.59

Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

Resizing JPGs without the loss of clarity

     
8:14 pm on Oct 6, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member essex_boy is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 19, 2003
posts: 3174
votes: 2


Can it be done? And with what software?
10:30 am on Oct 7, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Oct 4, 2002
posts:2204
votes: 0


Hi EssexBoy - if you mean making the image larger you are going to struggle - most methods I've heard of are limited; to enlarge a raster image file you will be adding data (pixels) through the software's interpolation algorithms. So there is going to be a loss of definition.

Photoshop would be the best tool for attempting this. I'd experiment with the bicubic interpolation settings increasing the image at 10% intervals. In CS3 there is a 'bicubic smoother' setting that is designed for increasing an image's size. Then you can tweak areas of the image using sharpening and blur tools to clean up areas of pixelation.

To make an image smaller is child's play - open it in you favourite editor and typically choose edit/image > image size > then select the %/dimensions you wish to resize it too > click go :)

1:48 pm on Oct 7, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member essex_boy is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 19, 2003
posts: 3174
votes: 2


Found the perfect tool with a free trial as well, has a feature to allow auto cleanup of the image.

I was very surprised to find something this good.

10:06 am on Oct 8, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 10, 2006
posts:661
votes: 0


You can't enlarge a photographic 'bitmap' file without *any* loss of clarity.

But, as limbo said, there are ways to make the best of it. Also, bear in mind that each time you make *any* adjustment to a jpeg and then save it, you lose image quality. It may be worth saving as another lossless file format, such as tiff or EPS.

12:35 pm on Oct 8, 2007 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

5+ Year Member

joined:June 6, 2007
posts:86
votes: 0


I agree with the above posts especially with the one that suggests Photoshop as the best tool for doing that. I have resized and edited loads of pics with its help and I can assure you that it provides the best quality compared to other different software solutions.

[edited by: Grandmas_Cookies at 12:36 pm (utc) on Oct. 8, 2007]

1:16 pm on Oct 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

5+ Year Member

joined:Feb 27, 2007
posts:111
votes: 0


Has anybody tried IrfanView?
9:26 am on Oct 12, 2007 (gmt 0)

New User

joined:Aug 22, 2007
posts: 6
votes: 0


I'm use Microsoft Office Picture Manager for this job
[office.microsoft.com...]
10:37 am on Oct 12, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Apr 1, 2006
posts:1536
votes: 0


Frida

Irfan View is excellent for making multiple thumbnails etc. I use it regulary for my resizing needs. Needs a little hit and trial to get it right the first time though..

5:42 am on Oct 15, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 4, 2004
posts:877
votes: 0


Do a search for genuine fractals, its a photoshop plug in specifically for scaling images up. Bi-cubic works but it "undefines" the edges. that software searches for edges and preserves them quite nicely.

Another method is to scale them in steps using bi-cubic. Use Neat Image in between steps to clean out the fuzziness.

1:33 am on Nov 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

New User

5+ Year Member

joined:Nov 9, 2007
posts:1
votes: 0


Irfanview is very small but yet very powerful program. I do lots of image editing in it including cutting a section of an image, resize, batch processing and many more.
6:26 am on Nov 9, 2007 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member essex_boy is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:May 19, 2003
posts:3174
votes: 2


Ill take a look at these thanks