Forum Moderators: not2easy

Message Too Old, No Replies

Reasons to use a web safe color pallet

         

Jon_King

2:42 pm on Mar 9, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



With all new video cards and monitors running far above the 216 web safe color pallet is there any reason to adhere to this seemingly outdated standard? I don't, your comments please.

pageoneresults

2:59 pm on Mar 9, 2004 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



No major concerns that I can think of. Here are some reasons why I still use a color safe palette.

  • I have the colors memorized.
  • Keeps my CSS files a litte trimmer. I use CSS shorthand for colors where possible. All of the web safe colors are paired color values.

Outside of those two reasons above, I can't think of anything else that would require someone to utilize the 216 web safe color palette.

Oh wait, it may be still of benefit to those using AOL/IE since they still utilize their proprietary compression method which I believe is based on the 216 color palette, I'm not 100% sure of that.

I just like using it because the hex codes are much easier to remember, especially using CSS shorthand...

color:#369;background;#fff;

Shannon Moore

3:01 pm on Mar 9, 2004 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



One reason is if your site's target market is likely to be browsing in 256 colors or less -- color cellphones, etc.

For several years now, Lynda Weinman (widely published web designer) has officially declared the web safe color palette "safe to ignore" in most design situations:
htt*://www.lynda.com/hex.html